2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-022-06293-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in children and adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, clinical tests to diagnose SLE or to predict flares have also lagged behind other scientific advances in medicine. In the "omics" era of biomarker discovery via DNA/RNA sequencing, epigenetics, and proteomics, SLE is still largely diagnosed and treated according to clinical classification criteria, as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) [39,40]. Typical laboratory testing conventionally ordered in the clinic to aid in SLE diagnosis includes anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA), and complement levels, but these tests have limited sensitivity and specificity [41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, clinical tests to diagnose SLE or to predict flares have also lagged behind other scientific advances in medicine. In the "omics" era of biomarker discovery via DNA/RNA sequencing, epigenetics, and proteomics, SLE is still largely diagnosed and treated according to clinical classification criteria, as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) [39,40]. Typical laboratory testing conventionally ordered in the clinic to aid in SLE diagnosis includes anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA), and complement levels, but these tests have limited sensitivity and specificity [41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para pacientes com doença precoce, os critérios SLICC 2012 demonstraram ser mais sensíveis, da mesma forma para pacientes cuja doença Brazilian Journal of Health Review, Curitiba, v. 6, n. 1, p.1150-1164, jan./feb., 2023 ainda não está estabelecida com envolvimento de múltiplos órgãos, ou seja, cuja doença apresenta uniorganicamente os critérios ACR 1997 e SLICC foram mais sensíveis. 21 . Pacientes cuja duração da doença é inferior a 5 anos, os critérios do SLICC 2012 terão melhor desempenho na classificação de pacientes.…”
Section: Sensibilidade E Especificidade Dos Sistemas De Classificação Dounclassified
“…Embora os critérios ACR/EULAR sejam os mais atualizados, há certas considerações a serem levadas em conta ao escolher os critérios para cada paciente, assim, para jovens e crianças, é muito melhor usar os critérios SLICC. 19,21 Por exemplo, no caso de pacientes com doença precoce e uniorgânica, são sugeridos critérios SLICC. 20,22 .…”
Section: Sensibilidade E Especificidade Dos Sistemas De Classificação Dounclassified
“…2 Hence, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SLE classification criteria and its revised version in the late nineties were globally applied and consequently improved our insight about the disease. 3 This improvement was evident in routine clinical practice by demonstrating several explicit skin manifestations and utilising immunological tests like complement levels (C3 &C4) and anti-B2Glycoprotein I (Anti-B2GPI) antibodies. Furthermore, mucocutaneous and several other organ involvements were better understood, warranting modifications to the classification criteria employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon assessing the three criteria, the EULAR/ACR criteria achieved the highest specificity and sensitivity of 93.4% and 96.1% as compared to 93% and 82.8% and 83.7% and 96.7% by revised ACR and SLICC criteria, respectively. 3 Furthermore, neuropsychiatric manifestations could be the presenting symptom of systemic lupus erythematosus. 7 These manifestations range from mild to severe, requiring high clinical suspicion to recognise and diagnose early.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%