1997
DOI: 10.1109/19.571829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the AC quantized Hall resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several NMIs have tested whether or not the frequencydependent QHR extrapolated to the frequency of 0 Hz differs from the quantized dc value. Different relative deviations in the range from 6 × 10 −8 to 2 × 10 −7 have been reported [15,96]. However, now we believe that no true deviation from the quantized dc value exists, at least within a relative uncertainty of 1 × 10 −8 .…”
Section: Better Understanding Of the Qhr Measured With Acsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several NMIs have tested whether or not the frequencydependent QHR extrapolated to the frequency of 0 Hz differs from the quantized dc value. Different relative deviations in the range from 6 × 10 −8 to 2 × 10 −7 have been reported [15,96]. However, now we believe that no true deviation from the quantized dc value exists, at least within a relative uncertainty of 1 × 10 −8 .…”
Section: Better Understanding Of the Qhr Measured With Acsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…As published in 1997, Wood et al at NRC verified these findings and also measured a frequency dependence of about 1 × 10 −7 kHz −1 but reported a much better plateau flatness [96]. Also the dependence on the magnitude of the measuring current was remarkably small [97], much smaller than later results of other NMIs obtained with different QHR devices.…”
Section: First Ac Qhr Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In the earlier decades of developing QHR standards, the many NMI efforts had succeeded in implementing new standards based on GaAs devices [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], and metrologists commenced to explore the extent to which these devices could accommodate other values of resistance, namely through the construction of quantum Hall array resistance standards (QHARS) [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. In conjunction, pursuits of standardized impedances from the QHE were well on their way at various NMIs to avoid using a difficult-to-construct calculable capacitor [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62].…”
Section: The Evolving Role Of the Quantum Hall Effect In Determining mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivation is to use this quantum effect to realize also the capacitance unit [5] and through it the inductance unit. The first ac QHR measurements revealed unexpected difficulties (see, for example, [6][7][8][9]). The plateaux measured with ac were not as flat as the plateaux measured with dc but were somehow curved or structured, and these structures increased linearly with frequency and current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%