2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the diffusion parameter EStImation with Gibbs and NoisE removal pipeline

Abstract: This work evaluates the accuracy and precision of the Diffusion parameter EStImation with Gibbs and NoisE Removal (DESIGNER) pipeline, developed to identify and minimize common sources of methodological variability including: thermal noise, Gibbs ringing artifacts, Rician bias, EPI and eddy current induced spatial distortions, and motion-related artifacts. Following this processing pipeline, iterative parameter estimation techniques were used to derive diffusion parameters of interest based on the diffusion te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
160
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
160
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diffusion images were processed using the DESIGNER pipeline (Ades‐Aron et al, ). DKI preprocessing steps including: Denoising using a principal component analysis technique (Veraart et al, ; Veraart, Fieremans, & Novikov, ), Rician bias correction within MRtrix (Version 3.0 rc2), Gibbs ringing correction (Kellner, Dhital, Kiselev, & Reisert, ), EPI distortion correction using topup (Andersson et al, ) in FMRIB's Software Library (FSL) version 5.0.11, eddy current and motion correction using eddy in FSL (Version 5.0.11; Andersson & Sotiropoulos, ), and signal outlier detection (Collier, Veraart, Jeurissen, den Dekker, & Sijbers, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusion images were processed using the DESIGNER pipeline (Ades‐Aron et al, ). DKI preprocessing steps including: Denoising using a principal component analysis technique (Veraart et al, ; Veraart, Fieremans, & Novikov, ), Rician bias correction within MRtrix (Version 3.0 rc2), Gibbs ringing correction (Kellner, Dhital, Kiselev, & Reisert, ), EPI distortion correction using topup (Andersson et al, ) in FMRIB's Software Library (FSL) version 5.0.11, eddy current and motion correction using eddy in FSL (Version 5.0.11; Andersson & Sotiropoulos, ), and signal outlier detection (Collier, Veraart, Jeurissen, den Dekker, & Sijbers, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AWF is hypothesized to constitute the fraction of diffusion signal that originates from intra‐axonal water. K max is the maximum kurtosis along all directions, and D e ,║ and D e ,⊥ are the apparent axial and radial diffusivities of the extra‐axonal space (Ades‐Aron et al, ; Jelescu et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed this motion correction strategy on purpose, as our focus was to study the effects of thermal noise mitigation on parametric maps. It is possible that the benefits of MP-PCA may extend beyond thermal noise mitigation and may also improve post-processing such as motion correction, as shown in other studies (Ades-Aron et al, 2018), which will be the subject of future investigations.…”
Section: In Vivo Studymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We synthesised a unique noise-free signal profile in each tissue voxel by simulating within-tissue variability in WM and GM. This ensures that each synthetic voxel has its own unique sources of signal, avoiding obvious redundancies within the set of synthetic signals, as these could lead to overestimation of the performances of MP-PCA denoising (Ades-Aron et al, 2018). In practice, we drew voxel-wise values for each of ( , T 1 , T 2 , AD, RD, , T 2 F , T 2 B , BPF) from a tissue-specific Gaussian distribution, with parameters inspired by values known from literature (Battiston et al, 2018a;Grussu et al, 2015;Smith et al, 2008) (parameters in Table 2).…”
Section: Signal Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%