World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-36841-0_508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Accuracy of the CyberKnife

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The software analyzed the ROI bony markers and the 6-D error of patient posture. The manipulator automatically corrected the position and orientation to compensate for the positioning error [ 6 ]. Dose fractionation and dosage per session were developed based on the patient’s general condition, performance status, tumor size, and location.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The software analyzed the ROI bony markers and the 6-D error of patient posture. The manipulator automatically corrected the position and orientation to compensate for the positioning error [ 6 ]. Dose fractionation and dosage per session were developed based on the patient’s general condition, performance status, tumor size, and location.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stereotactic radiotherapy allows tumor treatment with high dosage and low fractionation, thereby overcoming the dosage limitations of conventional radiation therapy and improving local control rate [ 1 - 5 ]. CyberKnife (CK) is one type of stereotactic radiosurgery system, employing real-time image guidance and a synchronized respiratory tracking system to deliver high dosages of hypofractionated radiation dynamically to the tumor with spatial precision that can reach the sub-millimeter scale [ 6 ]. Due to improved conformation and precision, a lethal dose of radiation can be delivered to the tumor while the surrounding normal tissues or vital organs are radiated with lower dosages and exposure ranges, leading to fewer side effects and improved safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system, used without a frame, allows for treatment targets either inside or outside the brain. The accuracy of the Cyberknife system, however, is only in the range of 0.93 mm [28]. The largest reported Cyberknife experience for glomus tumours was on 11 patients [29] where 18% of cases demonstrated tumour size reduction and no permanent complications were reported.…”
Section: Radiosurgical Seriesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, this approach introduces the generic limitations of a human operator (such as physiological latency), and even for these systems, the intrinsic accuracy of the components has significant effect on performance. (Kwoh et al, 1988); 2 (Paul et al, 1992); 3 (Taylor, 2001); 4 (Nishihara et al, 2006); 5 (Li et al, 2002); 6 (Varma et al, 2006); 7 (Haidegger et al, 2008);8 (Kwartowitz et al, 2006); 9 (Kwartowitz et al, 2007);10 (Dieterich et al, 2003); 11 (Jang et al, 2006); 12,13 (Cleary et al, 2006); 14 (Lieberman et al, 2006).…”
Section: Examples Of Accuracy Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%