2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the accuracy of mono-energetic electron and beta-emitting isotope dose-point kernels using particle and heavy ion transport code system: PHITS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EGS5 algorithm was introduced for simulating atomic interactions of electrons, positrons, and photons over a wide energy ranging from 1 keV to 1 TeV. This implementation improves the accuracy of electron transport simulation, especially for lower energies, which is very important from the viewpoint of medical physics applications [29]. In addition, consideration of electromagnetic fields in the transport of electrons and positrons became feasible.…”
Section: Improvements On Atomic Interaction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EGS5 algorithm was introduced for simulating atomic interactions of electrons, positrons, and photons over a wide energy ranging from 1 keV to 1 TeV. This implementation improves the accuracy of electron transport simulation, especially for lower energies, which is very important from the viewpoint of medical physics applications [29]. In addition, consideration of electromagnetic fields in the transport of electrons and positrons became feasible.…”
Section: Improvements On Atomic Interaction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…positron, negatron/electron, and photon transport; the default PHITS algorithm is used for a-decay when applicable. The accuracy of the EGS5 mode of PHITS in calculating dose-point kernels for monoenergetic electrons and b-emitting isotopes has been well validated (21). PARaDIM does not automatically account for decay of radionuclide progeny; that is, the user must therefore ensure that if the radionuclide is part of a decay chain, the time-integrated activity coefficients for the progeny are characterized appropriately and simulated separately.…”
Section: Code Development and Functionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 considering a sphere of 120 shells and thickness of , where was the range for the energy of maximum emission. Figure 4 shows beta-emitting radionuclide sDPK for (a) water and (b) compact bone, for Y and I, with the sDPK reported by Botta et al [ 66 ] and Shiiba et al [ 67 ]. It should be noted that the calculated sDPK was rescaled to the X90 scale [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Beta-emitting radionuclide sDPK calculated by Eq. 6 was benchmarked against previously reported results by Botta et al [ 66 ] and Shiiba et al [ 67 ]. Botta used FLUKA for simulating the sDPK, and Shiiba used PHITS (56).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%