[Retracted] Evaluation of the Antiasthmatic Activity of Carissa opaca in Animal Models

Abstract

Carissa opaca Stapf ex Haines (C. opaca) fruit is used traditionally in the treatment of respiratory illnesses including asthma. However, there is no scientific evidence supporting its antiasthmatic activity. The current study was conducted to evaluate its antiasthmatic effects using in vivo and in vitro approaches. The methanolic crude extract of C. opaca fruit (Co.Cr.) was used and in vivo antiasthmatic activity was carried out using ovalbumin- (OVA-) sensitized and OVA-challenged BALB/c mice. In in vitro bronchorelaxant activity of crude extract, aqueous and n-hexane fractions of C. opaca were carried out on isolated rat tracheal strips. Co.Cr. (200 and 400 mg/kg) attenuated ovalbumin-induced changes in lung histochemistry with % decrease in peribronchial inflammation of 14.1 ± 0.21 and 65.8 ± 0.22 and % decrease in total inflammatory cell count of 35.7 ± 2.80 and 53.3 ± 2.30 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Co.Cr., aqueous, and n-hexane fraction of C. opaca attenuated the precontractions induced by high K+ (80 mM) and carbachol (1 μM), respectively. In conclusion, the results showed that C. opaca possesses antiasthmatic activity via relaxant effect on bronchial smooth muscle which is mediated through calcium channel blockade and antimuscarinic activity. This study provides scientific evidence of the traditional use of C. opaca in the management of allergic asthma.

Retracted: Evaluation of the Antiasthmatic Activity of Carissa opaca in Animal Models

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Manipulated or compromised peer review …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”