2014
DOI: 10.5897/ajb2014.14032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the antioxidant effects of different forms of Schisandra chinesis in emulsion-type sausages during chilled storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The antioxidant activity of lignans is quite a controversial topic and literature results of lignans from Schisandra in particular, are contradictory. While some authors propose that lignans are good antioxidants and suggest the enrichment of several food products with these compounds in order to enhance their antioxidant properties (Kim, Lee, Do, & Bang, 2015;Kim & Choi, 2014), others state that their radicalscavenging properties are moderate and only effective at high concentrations (Šmejkal et al, 2010). Furthermore, antioxidant capacities of featured constituents and corresponding herbal preparations were mostly determined by (offline) bioassays such as the (traditional) DPPH, FRAP, or TEAC assays (Liu et al, 2009;Mocan et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2008).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The antioxidant activity of lignans is quite a controversial topic and literature results of lignans from Schisandra in particular, are contradictory. While some authors propose that lignans are good antioxidants and suggest the enrichment of several food products with these compounds in order to enhance their antioxidant properties (Kim, Lee, Do, & Bang, 2015;Kim & Choi, 2014), others state that their radicalscavenging properties are moderate and only effective at high concentrations (Šmejkal et al, 2010). Furthermore, antioxidant capacities of featured constituents and corresponding herbal preparations were mostly determined by (offline) bioassays such as the (traditional) DPPH, FRAP, or TEAC assays (Liu et al, 2009;Mocan et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2008).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 97%