2013
DOI: 10.3143/geriatrics.50.515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the association between cognitive impairment and the vitamin D levels among community-dwelling Japanese pre-frail elderly individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the mean vitamin D level was 43.1 nmol/L, which is lower than means in other studies. For example, one study reported a mean of 57.1 nmol/L in a sample of older Japanese adults, and another study detailed mean vitamin D levels from other studies that were higher than those in the current study (44.7–69.0 nmol/L). The lower vitamin D levels reported in the current study and in others on Asian populations highlight the importance of studying vitamin D from a global perspective.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the current study, the mean vitamin D level was 43.1 nmol/L, which is lower than means in other studies. For example, one study reported a mean of 57.1 nmol/L in a sample of older Japanese adults, and another study detailed mean vitamin D levels from other studies that were higher than those in the current study (44.7–69.0 nmol/L). The lower vitamin D levels reported in the current study and in others on Asian populations highlight the importance of studying vitamin D from a global perspective.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Other studies had different findings. One study reported no difference in MMSE scores in different vitamin D groups (reporting a negative association using the Short Blessed Test), and another found a negative association only in men in a Japanese sample. The sex interaction term in the current study was not significant, suggesting no sex difference in the sample in the association between vitamin D and cognitive impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations