2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-018-0825-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the axial crashworthiness of thin-walled structures with various and combined cross sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BBS-GS structure had a crushing force efficiency of 0.78, surpassing the traditional honeycomb structures by 32.2% [89]. The CFE of the square crash box structure exhibited a 15% increase compared to the square section and a 78% increase compared to the circular section [90]. Introduction of ribs in the single cell structures raised the SEA and CFE values up to 40% and 69% respectively [91].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The BBS-GS structure had a crushing force efficiency of 0.78, surpassing the traditional honeycomb structures by 32.2% [89]. The CFE of the square crash box structure exhibited a 15% increase compared to the square section and a 78% increase compared to the circular section [90]. Introduction of ribs in the single cell structures raised the SEA and CFE values up to 40% and 69% respectively [91].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…So that the force-displacement graph of the test and numerical solution was compared. In the F-D diagram the peak force generally occurs in the initial peak because of the component resist the deformation [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where δ is the final compression distance, m is the total mass of the tube. The specific meaning of these indicators can be found in [31,32].…”
Section: Quasi-static Compression Test For Oetmentioning
confidence: 99%