2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020jd033859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Causes of Wet‐Season Dry Biases Over Amazonia in CAM5

Abstract: This study investigates the causes of pronounced low precipitation bias over Amazonia in the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (CAM5), a common feature in many global climate models. Our analysis is based on a suite of 3‐day long hindcasts starting every day at 00Z from 1997 to 2012 and an AMIP simulation for the same period. The Amazonia dry bias appears by the second day in the hindcasts and is very robust for all the seasons with the largest bias magnitude during the wet season (December–February). The b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(130 reference statements)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For AOD, CESM1 compares well to reanalysis in all regions, except an underestimation of AOD in SEA (see figure 1(e) for regions). These discrepancies are consistent with previous research revealing the presence of a dry bias in South America [32,33] and underestimation of AOD [34,35] in climate models when compared to observations. Additionally, while it would be ideal to further compare simulated changes to observed changes over the 20th century, this is not possible due to the lack of observations in the early 20th century in the tropics [36], so we focus on the model results to evaluate mechanisms driving long-term changes.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For AOD, CESM1 compares well to reanalysis in all regions, except an underestimation of AOD in SEA (see figure 1(e) for regions). These discrepancies are consistent with previous research revealing the presence of a dry bias in South America [32,33] and underestimation of AOD [34,35] in climate models when compared to observations. Additionally, while it would be ideal to further compare simulated changes to observed changes over the 20th century, this is not possible due to the lack of observations in the early 20th century in the tropics [36], so we focus on the model results to evaluate mechanisms driving long-term changes.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…6&7). Consistent with previous studies (e.g., Dai, 2006;Tang et al 2021), the major de ciency of the CMIP6 models is the too early diurnal precipitation peak, where the multi-model mean of CMIP6 models shows a diurnal phase peaking around noon (or early afternoon) instead of the late-afternoon (or early-evening) precipitation peak from the observations. The relatively poorer performance of the simulated diurnal cycle of precipitation over land/coastal land compared with that over ocean/coastal ocean could be attributed to the complex topography effects and land-atmosphere interactions which are not properly represented in the models.…”
Section: Summary and Future Worksupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Using the Cloud Archive User Service (CLAUS) data, Yang and Slingo (2001) discovered a strong diurnal signal of precipitation over the coastal regions and demonstrated that the climate model has considerable di culty in capturing the observed diurnal phase of precipitation. Generally, common climate model de ciencies in reproducing the diurnal variation of precipitation include the too often convection triggering at reduced intensity, the too early precipitation onset, and the missing of nocturnal precipitation peak (e.g., Dai, 2006;Xie et al 2019;Cui et al 2021;Ma et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also fail to reproduce the observed moisture sink between 250 and 650 hPa. These discrepancies were also found in the Large‐scale Biosphere–Atmosphere experiment (LBA) conducted in southwest Amazonia (Ma et al ., 2021a), indicating that models produce too shallow afternoon convection over the broad Amazon region. The fact that models simulate Q 1 and Q 2 well at SGP but poorly at MAO also highlights the dependence of model performances at different locations.…”
Section: Model Performances On the Mean Diurnal Cycle Of Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%