2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2005.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the chemiluminescent nitrogen detector for solubility determinations to support drug discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 The equimolar nitrogen response of the detector was calibrated using TRIZMA base at 28 concentrations spanning the dynamic range of the instrument from 0.08 to 4500 µg/ml nitrogen and the measured solubility values were corrected for background nitrogen. On board performance indicating standards (Imipramine HCl, Sulfamethizole and Astemizole) were used to validate assay results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 The equimolar nitrogen response of the detector was calibrated using TRIZMA base at 28 concentrations spanning the dynamic range of the instrument from 0.08 to 4500 µg/ml nitrogen and the measured solubility values were corrected for background nitrogen. On board performance indicating standards (Imipramine HCl, Sulfamethizole and Astemizole) were used to validate assay results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compound 1 is very lipophilic (cLogP = 5.81, chromLogD = 4.75) 21 and displays very poor solubility (19 μM) (Supporting Information, Table S2). 22 The high number of aromatic rings surely contributes to the establishment of favorable π-stacking interactions, resulting in low solubility. Not unexpectedly, R 3 quinolinyl compounds 16a – c also presented very low solubility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LC-CLND has been extensively used in the field of drug discovery, in quality assessment of combinatorial libraries [5,15,16] and in solubility determinations [17]. In forensic chemistry, our group was able to directly quantify the active components of seized street drug samples at an accuracy better than 11% without using primary reference standards [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%