2011
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive procedures for breast cancer screening at a teaching hospital

Abstract: Based on an overall analysis, WBN displayed the highest clinical efficacy compared with FNA and imprint, and demonstrated adequate safety for confirming the appropriate diagnosis and management of patients, ensuring the efficacy of the service.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For several years, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was the most practiced method for the pathological diagnosis of breast masses. FNAC became popular because of its accuracy, cost effectiveness, and ease of use [8][9][10][11][12] . A total number of 200 patients were recruited for this study after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For several years, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was the most practiced method for the pathological diagnosis of breast masses. FNAC became popular because of its accuracy, cost effectiveness, and ease of use [8][9][10][11][12] . A total number of 200 patients were recruited for this study after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a cheap, fast, and reliable diagnostic method. It also reduces the frequency of open biopsies 9 . Some of the setback of FNAC include pain and haematoma formation.…”
Section: Phylloidesmentioning
confidence: 99%