2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the cobas 4800 CT/NG Test for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA in urogenital swabs and urine specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All samples were tested for N. gonorrhoeae with the Cobas 4800 CT/NG test. This assay targets a direct repeat region called DR-9 that is specific for N. gonorrhoeae (19). The Cobas test utilizes amplification using two sets of primers and probes to detect two highly conserved variations within the DR-9 region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples were tested for N. gonorrhoeae with the Cobas 4800 CT/NG test. This assay targets a direct repeat region called DR-9 that is specific for N. gonorrhoeae (19). The Cobas test utilizes amplification using two sets of primers and probes to detect two highly conserved variations within the DR-9 region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) DNA in urine specimens were detected with a Roche Cobas 4800 CT/NG Assay (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.), which had a sensitivity of 96.6% and a specificity of 100% [ 16 ]. Only participants with positive results were notified, then referred to a local STI clinic or general hospital for treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estos hallazgos reafirman el rol de la conducta sexual en la prevalencia de infección asintomática por C. trachomatis, más que la variable socio-económica o educacional. Estos datos son concordantes con estudios similares realizados (con la misma técnica) en China, Países Bajos y España, los cuales muestran prevalencias significativamente más altas para esta infección entre trabajadoras sexuales, en población con conducta sexual más liberal o en pacientes que permanecen en control en centros para el manejo de ITS [34][35][36][37] . Otra parte del análisis, consistió en comparar para factores de riesgo las pacientes que resultaron con tamizaje positivo versus aquellas que resultaron con tamizaje negativo.…”
Section: Artículo Originalunclassified