2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.icl.00000117255.97190.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Corneal Effects of Topical Ophthalmic Fluoroquinolones Using In Vivo Confocal Microscopy

Abstract: We have previously used confocal microscopy to establish a correlation between epithelial thinning (due to superficial cell loss) and slight ocular irritation. The results of this study suggest that Moxi induces less damage to the corneal epithelium than other antibiotic solutions, perhaps because it does not contain BAC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
35
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Burka et al 21 compared the epithelial wound healing after the treatment of photorefractive keratectomy with moxifloxacin (Vigamox) or with gatifloxacin (Zymar), and found that the eye treated with moxifloxacin healed faster. Kovoor et al, 22 using confocal microscopy to evaluate corneal epithelium and stromal thickness after treating rabbits with different FQs, found that moxifloxacin induced less damage than other FQs. However, the ofloxacin and levofloxacin they tested contained 0.005% BAC, which was different from the commercial solutions we tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Burka et al 21 compared the epithelial wound healing after the treatment of photorefractive keratectomy with moxifloxacin (Vigamox) or with gatifloxacin (Zymar), and found that the eye treated with moxifloxacin healed faster. Kovoor et al, 22 using confocal microscopy to evaluate corneal epithelium and stromal thickness after treating rabbits with different FQs, found that moxifloxacin induced less damage than other FQs. However, the ofloxacin and levofloxacin they tested contained 0.005% BAC, which was different from the commercial solutions we tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Although the superiority of clinical efficacy between different FQs is still under evaluation, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] controversial results exist that compare the toxicity of FQs towards the corneal epithelial cells. 19,[21][22][23] The ocular and systemic safety profile of newer FQs is generally considered comparable with those of other FQ antimicrobial agents, with a low recognized risk of quinolone-related toxicity. [24][25][26][27] However, Walter et al 28 reported two cases of severe sterile corneal ulcers after the topical application of moxifloxacin, and the drug was suspected of interfering with corneal healing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Данные количественной оценки состояния клеток эпителия роговицы до и после закапывания антибактериального препарата (Левофлоксацин дженерик) у пациентов 3-й группы по данным конфокальной микроскопии Если антибиотик или консервант, входящий в состав капель, обладает токсичностью по от-ношению к эпителию роговицы, проницаемость также может повышаться [12].…”
Section: пациентunclassified
“…Проведённые Таблица 4 Данные качественной оценки состояния клеток эпителия роговицы у пациентов 2-й группы (Моксифлоксацин) по дан-ным конфокальной микроскопии ранее зарубежные исследования показали, что фторхинолоны в различной степени способны подавлять пролиферацию кератоцитов [14] и при высоких концентрациях оказывать цитотоксиче-ский эффект на эпителий и эндотелий роговицы [12]. В ранних работах по оценке цитотоксично-сти фторхинолонов было установлено, что ци-профлоксацин обладал наименьшей цитотоксич-ностью по отношению к роговичному эпителию в сравнении с норфлоксацином и офлоксацином, а также гентамицином и тобрамицином [9].…”
Section: пациентunclassified
“…Thus, the fourth-generation fluoroquinolones are extensively used clinically in the ocular field with time. However, fluoroquinolones may delay the healing process of the corneal epithelium and particularly the development of haze and scarring in corneal tissue, and these may have a negative effect on the visual outcome [11]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%