2019
DOI: 10.4314/jasem.v22i11.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Cytogenotoxic Effects of Emulsifiable Concentrate form of Amitraz Pesticide on <i>Allium cepa</i> L

Abstract: The cytogenotoxic effects of emulsifiable concentrate of amitraz pesticides was evaluated using Allium cepa L. test. The root meristems of A. cepa L. were treated with five concentrations (1%, 5%, 10%, 20% and 40%) of the chemical pesticide at 48 h for cytogenetic analyses and 96 h for root length inhibition. Pesticide doses affected root length significantly (P<0.05) at 5% to 40%; with 50% effective concentration (EC50) value of 18% while there was no significant difference between control and 1% (p>0.05). Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it caused abnormal segregation of chromosomes so that different chromosomal abnormalities were formed, the most frequent being multipolar, break, stickiness, vagrant, bridge, c-mitosis, and micro-nucleus. Similar genotoxic results are obtained in studies conducted on pesticides acting as genotoxic and mutagenic agents (Adesuyi et al 2018, Kumari et al 2020, Macar 2021. Analysis of the data showed that the most frequent CAs were multipolar anaphase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Also, it caused abnormal segregation of chromosomes so that different chromosomal abnormalities were formed, the most frequent being multipolar, break, stickiness, vagrant, bridge, c-mitosis, and micro-nucleus. Similar genotoxic results are obtained in studies conducted on pesticides acting as genotoxic and mutagenic agents (Adesuyi et al 2018, Kumari et al 2020, Macar 2021. Analysis of the data showed that the most frequent CAs were multipolar anaphase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It has been reported that this may be due to the failure to separate the chromosomes, due to the loss of the Ki-67 protein (BRANGwyNNE and MARKO, 2016). It could also be interpreted as the result of DNA depolymerization, partial dissolution of nucleoproteins, breakage and exchanges of the folded chromatid fiber, and the removal of non-histone proteins from the chromosomes (ADESUyI et al, 2018). These are entities in which the chromosomes are not free, but are united by a thin filament.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those metaphases that presented no more than 4 overlapping chromosomes and differed in no more than 2 centromers (MOSESSO et al, 2013) from the diploid number of the species (2n=78) were analyzed. In each metaphase, the following observations were recorded: chromatidchromosome gaps (ctg-csg) and breaks (ctb-csb), acentric fragment (ace), telomeric association by a chromatid-chromatid-association (at1), telomeric associations (at), deletions (del), pulverized metaphase (pvz), endoduplicated metaphase (end), early chromatid segregation (seg) (UDROIU and SGURA 2017) and sticky (sti) chromosomes (ADROvIĆ et al, 2016;ADESUyI et al, 2018). The results are expressed as the frequency of each variable analyzed/100 cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%