1982
DOI: 10.1016/0035-9203(82)90197-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the diethylcarbamazine provocative test in the diagnosis of Wuchereria bancrofti infections in the Nigerian savanna and the effects on Dipetalonema perstans

Abstract: Large scale filariasis surveys in rural areas for microfilaraemia, especially of periodic types such as Wuchereria bancrofti are known to cause considerable administrative, technical and social problems. The present investigation was carried out in the population of two villages in the Malumfashi district of the Northern Nigerian savanna. From the survey results, the sensitivity and specificity of two techniques-day-time diethylcarbamazine (DEC) provocative test by blood smear and concentration, and night-bloo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 39.7% of all collections were parous, and 0.3% were infective. Although lower than the 3.3% infective rate observed for A. gambiae in Malumfsshi, a savannah area of northern Nigeria about two and a half decades earlier [36], it is comparable with the 0.4% infected rate reported in Tanzanian study. is indicates that A. gambiae is probably a better vector in a Tanzanian area than in the Imo River Basin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…A total of 39.7% of all collections were parous, and 0.3% were infective. Although lower than the 3.3% infective rate observed for A. gambiae in Malumfsshi, a savannah area of northern Nigeria about two and a half decades earlier [36], it is comparable with the 0.4% infected rate reported in Tanzanian study. is indicates that A. gambiae is probably a better vector in a Tanzanian area than in the Imo River Basin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The sensitivity of this daytime test was comparable with night blood examination. 7 This test should be avoided in patients at risk for co-infection with Onchocerca volvulus. Serology is limited by cross-reactivity with other helminths and is unable to distinguish past from current infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But due to loss of accuracy, technical and social difficulties this method is not often practiced. 12 Day and night densities are highly correlated (r = 0.83), but the densities tend to be lower in the day blood following provocation than in the corresponding night blood, except in very light infections. 13 Serological tests are the tests of choice as markers of infection, but do not confirm existing infection.…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 93%