1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1998.tb00360.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the discriminatory power of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and PCR fingerprinting for epidemiologic typing of Candida species

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the discriminatory power of genotyping methods (PCR fingerprinting and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis) validated for Candida albicans in other Candida species. METHODS: Molecular typing methods are increasingly being applied for studies where the interpretation of data essentially relies on the typing results rather than epidemiologic data. In this situation, the discriminatory power (ability to identify differences among epidemiologically unrelated strains) of the typing method is imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On only 5 (4.1%) of 123 occasions were both the healthcare worker and the patient for whom care was provided found to carry the same strain of yeast. This finding, obtained using two different typing methods [40], supports prior studies showing possible cross-transmission of yeast strains from healthcare workers to patients [11,15,28,36], but it does not prove that crosstransmission occurred. Further studies focusing on daily healthcare worker-patient interactions, taking into account such factors as hand washing, glove use, and use of invasive devices, should help define further the role that healthcare worker-patient interactions play in the transmission of yeasts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…On only 5 (4.1%) of 123 occasions were both the healthcare worker and the patient for whom care was provided found to carry the same strain of yeast. This finding, obtained using two different typing methods [40], supports prior studies showing possible cross-transmission of yeast strains from healthcare workers to patients [11,15,28,36], but it does not prove that crosstransmission occurred. Further studies focusing on daily healthcare worker-patient interactions, taking into account such factors as hand washing, glove use, and use of invasive devices, should help define further the role that healthcare worker-patient interactions play in the transmission of yeasts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Applied to specific situations, each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages. Karyotyping by PFGE was shown to be a useful molecular typing tool for various Candida species [18]. In our study electrophoretic karyotyping using PFGE showed a single chromosomal pattern for these outbreak isolates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) was used for cluster analysis. Isolates were considered different when the band similarity value was less than 95 % (Voss et al, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%