Evaluation of the durability of mortar and concrete applied with inorganic coating material and surface treatment system

Moon, Han-Young; Shin, Dong Gu; Choi, Doo-Sun

doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.012

Cited by 164 publications

(83 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recent study showed that paint coating can reduce 28-day carbonation depth of concrete by 46% 31 . The accelerated carbonation test of prime impermeable anti-deteriorating coating in Republic of Korea for 7days, 14days, 28 days, and 56 days showed that the carbonation correction coefficients of coating ranged from 24% to 42% 32 .…”

Section: Coating and Coveringsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Substantial global carbon uptake by cement carbonation

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Calcination of carbonate rocks during the manufacture of cement produced 5% of global CO2 emissions from all industrial process and fossil-fuel combustion in 20131, 2. Considerable attention has been paid to quantifying these industrial process emissions from cement production2, 3, but the natural reversal of the process—carbonation—has received little attention in carbon cycle studies. Here, we use new and existing data on cement materials during cement service life, demolition, and secondary use of concrete waste to estimate regional and global CO2 uptake between 1930 and 2013 using an analytical model describing carbonation chemistry. We find that carbonation of cement materials over their life cycle represents a large and growing net sink of CO2, increasing from 0.10 GtC yr−1 in 1998 to 0.25 GtC yr−1 in 2013. In total, we estimate that a cumulative amount of 4.5 GtC has been sequestered in carbonating cement materials from 1930 to 2013, offsetting 43% of the CO2 emissions from production of cement over the same period, not including emissions associated with fossil use during cement production. We conclude that carbonation of cement products represents a substantial carbon sink that is not currently considered in emissions inventories1, 3, 4

show abstract

Section: Coating and Coveringsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Substantial global carbon uptake by cement carbonation

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They are generally concrete can improve its freeze-thaw durability (Li et al 2012;Litvan 1992) and resistance to alkali-aggregate reactions (Filice, Wong 2001). Almusallam et al (2003) and Moon et al (2007) observed that surface coatings substantially improved the freeze-thaw resistance of concrete due to reduced water absorption. Ibrahim et al (1999), Al-Dulaijan et al (2000), Oshiro and Tanigawa (1988), and Seneviratne et al (2000) reported that surface coatings significantly decrease reinforcement corrosion in concrete by decreasing the ingress of chloride-laden water.…”

Section: Classification Of Sealers/coatingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Water Vapor Transmission and Waterproofing Performance of Concrete Sealer and Coating Systems

Soudki

2015

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This paper reports the water vapor transmission and waterproofing performance of a silane-based penetrating sealer (PS), two cementitious coatings (CC1 and CC2), and a polymeric coating (PC). The sealer and coating products were applied on 100-mm concrete cubes. In total, fifteen concrete cubes including the control specimens were prepared.The treated concrete cubes were tested to determine the ability of the selected products to improve waterproofing and to transmit water vapor. The correlation between water vapor transmission and waterproofing performance was also examined. Experimental results revealed that the cementitious coating CC2 had the lowest degree of water vapor transmission but the highest degree of waterproofing performance. In contrast, the highest degree of water vapor transmission but the lowest degree of waterproofing performance were observed for the cementitious coating CC1. The penetrating sealer PS provided greater water vapor transmission but lower waterproofing ability than the polymeric coating PC and the cementitious coating CC2. The best-performing coating with regard to water vapor transmission and waterproofing was the polymeric coating PC. Furthermore, the water vapor transmission and waterproofing performance of the sealer and coating systems were strongly correlated; this suggests that one of these two properties can be predicted by testing the other.

show abstract

“…Durability of concrete can also be improved by using different cement types and pozzolanic additions, changing the aggregate type, addition of polymers to the concrete mix, application of cement-bound surface layers and impregnation with water repellents, pore blockers or coatings (Barbucci et al 1997, De Belie et al 1997, De Belie et al 1998, De Belie et al 2000, Almusallam et al 2003, Moon et al 2007). The other targets of modification studies of concrete materials were improved durability (De Belie et al 1997, De Belie et al 1998, Moon et al 2007) and anti-bacterial and anti-fungal properties (Navas Martin and Borralleras Mas 2005). Pesonen-Leinonen (2005) discussed different soiling and cleaning apparatus which are generally used in laboratory studies to simulate and control soiling and cleaning of plastic and ceramic surfaces.…”

Section: Concrete Materials and Coatingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The chemical stresses especially are due to milk, silage and manure (ACI 515.1R-79 1985, Bertron et al 2005, Nilsson 2005). Because concrete is a very porous material, in many cases the improvement of concrete is based on limiting its absorption of liquids (Barbucci et al 1997, Almusallam et al 2003, Moon et al 2007). Durability of concrete can also be improved by using different cement types and pozzolanic additions, changing the aggregate type, addition of polymers to the concrete mix, application of cement-bound surface layers and impregnation with water repellents, pore blockers or coatings (Barbucci et al 1997, De Belie et al 1997, De Belie et al 1998, De Belie et al 2000, Almusallam et al 2003, Moon et al 2007).…”

Section: Concrete Materials and Coatingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Because concrete is a very porous material, in many cases the improvement of concrete is based on limiting its absorption of liquids (Barbucci et al 1997, Almusallam et al 2003, Moon et al 2007). Durability of concrete can also be improved by using different cement types and pozzolanic additions, changing the aggregate type, addition of polymers to the concrete mix, application of cement-bound surface layers and impregnation with water repellents, pore blockers or coatings (Barbucci et al 1997, De Belie et al 1997, De Belie et al 1998, De Belie et al 2000, Almusallam et al 2003, Moon et al 2007). The other targets of modification studies of concrete materials were improved durability (De Belie et al 1997, De Belie et al 1998, Moon et al 2007) and anti-bacterial and anti-fungal properties (Navas Martin and Borralleras Mas 2005).…”

Section: Concrete Materials and Coatingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation