DOI: 10.14264/uql.2018.784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Dynamical Structures of Postural Control: New Insights into Motor Adaptation in Ageing and Pain

Abstract: Ageing and pain affect performance of the postural control system. These changes affect the ability to flexibly adapt to challenges with potential consequences for balance and falls risk, and potential to understand the nature of adaptations to pain. The overall aim of this thesis was to provide insight into the dynamical nature of standing and walking postural control quantified using non-linear methods to address these issues. Studies One and Two of this thesis investigated postural control of upright balanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 342 publications
(801 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies have proposed that subjects with neuromotor disorders (e.g., CP, SCI, stroke) recruit significantly fewer muscle synergies than healthy subjects during task execution [44]. Due to neuromuscular control deficits and muscle weakness, such a reduction in synergy number is hard to change during training [45], [46]. Although the TAAN force field could alter muscle weightings in each synergy, the synergy number remains stable during training [20].…”
Section: A Ff Vs No-ffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have proposed that subjects with neuromotor disorders (e.g., CP, SCI, stroke) recruit significantly fewer muscle synergies than healthy subjects during task execution [44]. Due to neuromuscular control deficits and muscle weakness, such a reduction in synergy number is hard to change during training [45], [46]. Although the TAAN force field could alter muscle weightings in each synergy, the synergy number remains stable during training [20].…”
Section: A Ff Vs No-ffmentioning
confidence: 99%