2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2015.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the effect of c.2946+1G>T mutation on splicing in the SCN1A gene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Tunisia, the analysis of DEE remains con ned to a few cases based on candidate gene approach or clinical exome sequencing instead of targeted sequencing [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Yet, in terms of DEE for which more than 100 candidate genes were reported with a phenotypic heterogeneity, investing in targeted sequencing may be an optimal method for choice as this approach facilitates the analysis of generated sequencing data, reduces sequencing cost, increases sequencing depth, and does not include any ethical concerns in terms of the return results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Tunisia, the analysis of DEE remains con ned to a few cases based on candidate gene approach or clinical exome sequencing instead of targeted sequencing [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Yet, in terms of DEE for which more than 100 candidate genes were reported with a phenotypic heterogeneity, investing in targeted sequencing may be an optimal method for choice as this approach facilitates the analysis of generated sequencing data, reduces sequencing cost, increases sequencing depth, and does not include any ethical concerns in terms of the return results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most likely outcomes of alterations at acceptor (3′) or donor (5′) splice sites are exon skipping or cryptic splice site activation causing insertions, deletions, or intron retention [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Studies have demonstrated that an altered donor site could lead to skipping of the exon upstream the genetic change [ 32 , 33 , 34 ] as well as utilising the cryptic splice site upstream or downstream the canonical splicing site [ 35 , 36 , 37 ]. Moreover, a recent study by X. Lv et al revealed and further confirmed that a single variant in the canonical splicing site could induce production of several transcripts of different lengths and exonic/intronic structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%