Background
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of nasal septum deviation and inferior turbinate hypertrophy on nasal obstruction by utilizing the Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) values and paranasal sinus computed tomography (PSCT) findings for correct preoperative evaluation.
Methods
Ninety-six patients (57 males and 39 females) aged between 18 and 54 years (mean age, 30.3 ± 9.7 years) participated in this study. Among them, 56 patients underwent septoplasty combined with inferior turbinate outfracture, while 40 patients underwent septoplasty alone. Preoperative nasal examinations were performed on all patients. The direction, location, nasal septum deviation classification, and inferior turbinate hypertrophy size classification were carefully evaluated and compared with the NOSE survey results. PSCT of 56 patients were evaluated and classified by calculating the coronal location of septum deviation, the axial location of septum deviation, the coronal angle of septum deviation, and the axial angle of septum deviation.
Results
A positive correlation was found between the coronal location of the septal deviation and the preoperative NOSE 2, and the NOSE total, and the difference of postoperative and preoperative NOSE (p = 0.032, p = 0.007, p = 0.021, respectively). There was a statistically significant relationship between the coronal location of the septal deviation classification and the NOSE preoperative total values (p = 0.26). A negative statistically significant correlation was found between inferior turbinate hypertrophy and preoperative NOSE 5 values (p = 0.029).
Conclusion
We conclude that the combination of PSCT and the NOSE scale is helpful in determining the severity of nasal obstruction prior to surgery. Specifically, we found that nasal septum deviations located in the anterior and coronal planes have a greater impact on nasal obstruction compared to deviations in the axial plane. Inferior turbinate fracture does not provide more benefit than septoplasty alone in treating patients’ nasal obstruction. These findings emphasize the importance of a comprehensive approach in addressing nasal obstruction for optimal patient outcomes.