2005
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the effect of routine histologic processing on the size of skin samples obtained from dogs

Abstract: Processing of skin samples obtained from dogs for histologic evaluation can cause changes in sample dimensions; samples may decrease in length and width by as much as 32% and increase in thickness by 75.8%, compared with their original dimensions. The presence of muscle in canine skin samples can restrict the amount of shrinkage in length or width associated with processing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
53
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
12
53
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to the pattern reported for dogs whereby the length and width decreased by 26.5% and the depth increased by 65.3%. 28 The decrease in length and width of skin samples is consistent with results of similar studies 11-13 of humans in which lateral margins decreased (range, 15% to 25% of the original dimension). However, an increase in depth of tissue has not been consistently found in human samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is similar to the pattern reported for dogs whereby the length and width decreased by 26.5% and the depth increased by 65.3%. 28 The decrease in length and width of skin samples is consistent with results of similar studies 11-13 of humans in which lateral margins decreased (range, 15% to 25% of the original dimension). However, an increase in depth of tissue has not been consistently found in human samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This finding was also noted in the canine study, 28 whereby the samples had a thicker depth but smaller width and length. A plausible explanation for the increase in depth of samples after tissue processing was the reexpansion and possible overexpansion that may have occurred when samples were placed in the water bath after sectioning with a microtome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the presence of those artifacts is supposed to be comparable in each specimen independently form the technique employed. Artifacts are caused by the traction with forceps on the edge of the tissue and they are not linked to thermal energy that causes contraction of collagen in the dermal tissue and subsequent possible irregular shrinking [12]. This distortion, together with changes associated with fixation and cutting artifacts, may have contributed to some of the irregular margins observed [13].…”
Section: Overallmentioning
confidence: 99%