2011
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3181bbd721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Systematized Training of Advanced Trauma Life Support Protocol in the Interpretation of Cervical Spine and Chest Radiographs in Three Different Emergency Services

Abstract: Introduction: Most Brazilian hospitals have no medical radiologists for emergencies. The radiologic evaluation is provided by doctors with heterogeneous generalist training. The objective is to demonstrate the need for systematization in the care of trauma in the interpretation of cervical spine and chest radiographs. Is it possible that, through a continuing education program, generalist doctors could be trained in the evaluation of these radiographs? Materials and Methods: Twenty-five doctors of various spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of standardised protocols and guidelines was highlighted in 51% (29/57) of papers [ 9 , 25 , 27 – 32 , 36 , 37 , 40 – 44 , 47 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 59 , 61 , 62 , 65 67 , 71 – 74 ]. Key themes relating to lack of protocol include those in relation to record-keeping (six papers) and pre-hospital communication, (six papers).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of standardised protocols and guidelines was highlighted in 51% (29/57) of papers [ 9 , 25 , 27 – 32 , 36 , 37 , 40 – 44 , 47 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 59 , 61 , 62 , 65 67 , 71 – 74 ]. Key themes relating to lack of protocol include those in relation to record-keeping (six papers) and pre-hospital communication, (six papers).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen articles [25,29,33,47,55,56,59,62,64,66,68,69,75,79] were assessed against the RTI item bank for risk of bias. Five articles were reviews or reports [39,44,54,76,77], and therefore could not be evaluated.…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%