Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Psychoeducation Given to Children with Parental Psychiatric Disorders

Küçük, Leyla; Bilgin, Hülya; İkican, Tuba Çömez; Kaçar, Selma; Kadak, Muhammed Tayyip; Demirel, Ömer Faruk; Çoban, Vahdi; Kutlu, Yasemin; Poyraz, Cana Aksoy; Buzlu, Sevim; Duran, Alaattin

doi:10.1080/01612840.2020.1756010

Cited by 4 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Qualitative methods were used in five studies, whereof three were based on interviews with children and adolescents (Kahl & Jungbauer, 2014 ; Trondsen & Tjora, 2014 ; Wangensteen & Westby, 2019 ), one study was based on verbal response, field notes and observations (Palumbo et al., 2022 ) and in one study, 64 clinicians were interviewed (Bartsch et al., 2015 ). Eight studies used quantitative methods (Collishaw et al., 2016 ; Evans et al., 2015 ; Küçük et al., 2020 ; Monti & Rudolph, 2017 ; Nijjar et al., 2014 ; Sipler et al., 2020 ; Van Loon et al., 2015 ; Watson et al., 2014 ) and one study was mixed methods (O'Connor et al., 2014 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The remaining nine studies focused on children of parents with mental illness. The parental mental illnesses included borderline personality (Bartsch et al., 2015 ), schizophrenia (Kahl & Jungbauer, 2014 ), schizophrenia and depression (Küçük et al., 2020 ), bipolar disorder (Nijjar et al., 2014 ), recurrent depression (Collishaw et al., 2016 ; Evans et al., 2015 ; Monti & Rudolph, 2017 ; Watson et al., 2014 ) and parents that had attempted suicide or diagnosed with bipolar disorder or psychotic events (Trondsen & Tjora, 2014 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Children and adolescents growing up with parental mental illness or alcohol or substance misuse pointed out family resources acting side by side with the difficulties these families go through. Protective parental characteristics were recognized in several of the studies (Bartsch et al, 2015;Collishaw et al, 2016;Kahl & Jungbauer, 2014;Watson et al, 2014) and family support and cohesion were highlighted in the two intervention studies, showing how psychoeducation programs may strengthen family resources (Küçük et al, 2020;Sipler et al, 2020). Bartsch et al (2015) described protective parental characteristics comprised of the parent's capacity for self-reflection on their own illness, and how this could have an impact on their child, but also parents' willingness to engage in treatment in relation to the severity of their symptoms.…”

Section: Family Resourcesmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…First, absence of symptoms, risk behaviour or mental illness, despite increased risk was used to operationalize resilience in the children and adolescents (Collishaw et al, 2016;O'Connor et al, 2014). Second, resilience factors or protective factors were described as individual resources and external facilitators for building resilience or mediating the impact of adversity (Collishaw et al, 2016;Küçük et al, 2020;O'Connor et al, 2014;Sipler et al, 2020;Van Loon et al, 2015;Watson et al, 2014).…”

Section: Operationalization and Interpretation Of Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Examples of Individual resources or internal protective factors were self-esteem and self-disclosure (Van Loon et al, 2015), adaptation and empathy (Küçük et al, 2020) and personal and social competence (Sipler et al, 2020). The indicators used to assess external protective factors concerned family responsiveness or warmth (Collishaw et al, 2016;Watson et al, 2014), family support or cohesion (Küçük et al, 2020;O'Connor et al, 2014;Sipler et al, 2020;Van Loon et al, 2015) and peer relationships (Collishaw et al, 2016), peer support and school support (Küçük et al, 2020) and social resources (Sipler et al, 2020).…”

Section: Operationalization and Interpretation Of Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Resilience in children of parents with mental illness, alcohol or substance misuse—An integrative review

Ahlborg,

Nygren,

Svedberg

et al. 2024

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimThe aim of this integrative review was to investigate how resilience has been researched and explore experiences of resilience, in children of parents with mental illness or alcohol or substance misuse.DesignAn integrative review.MethodThe search included three major electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus and PsycINFO with the aim of identifying peer‐reviewed studies where the concept of resilience was explored as resilience, coping, adaptation or protective factors.ResultsOut of 4016 studies, 14 were included after meeting predetermined criteria and methodological quality evaluation. The findings are presented in five categories: characteristics of the studies, operationalization and interpretation of resilience, individual resources, family resources and resources outside the family.Patient or public contributionResilience in children of parents with mental illness or substance misuse refers to coping strategies, protective factors and absence of symptoms or risk behaviour despite being exposed to risk. We suggest a three‐level approach for mapping of resilience resources in the target group: the individual level, family level and outside of the family that includes both non‐professionals and professionals. The use of disengagement or avoidance strategies implies poor resilience but may be necessary in absence of support, as acts of self‐preservation during chaotic periods or harmful situations.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Family Resourcesmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Operationalization and Interpretation Of Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Operationalization and Interpretation Of Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Resilience in children of parents with mental illness, alcohol or substance misuse—An integrative review

Ahlborg,

Nygren,

Svedberg

et al. 2024

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Parenting interventions for people with schizophrenia or related serious mental illness

Radley

Grant

Barlow

et al. 2021

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Primary-level and community worker interventions for the prevention of mental disorders and the promotion of well-being in low- and middle-income countries

Purgato,

Prina,

Ceccarelli

et al. 2023

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background There is a significant research gap in the field of universal, selective, and indicated prevention interventions for mental health promotion and the prevention of mental disorders. Barriers to closing the research gap include scarcity of skilled human resources, large inequities in resource distribution and utilization, and stigma. Objectives To assess the effectiveness of delivery by primary workers of interventions for the promotion of mental health and universal prevention, and for the selective and indicated prevention of mental disorders or symptoms of mental illness in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). To examine the impact of intervention delivery by primary workers on resource use and costs. Search methods We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus, PsycInfo, WHO ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 29 November 2021. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of primary‐level and/or community health worker interventions for promoting mental health and/or preventing mental disorders versus any control conditions in adults and children in LMICs. Data collection and analysis Standardized mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) were used for continuous outcomes, and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data, using a random‐effects model. We analyzed data at 0 to 1, 1 to 6, and 7 to 24 months post‐intervention. For SMDs, 0.20 to 0.49 represented small, 0.50 to 0.79 moderate, and ≥ 0.80 large clinical effects. We evaluated the risk of bias (RoB) using Cochrane RoB2. Main results Description of studies We identified 113 studies with 32,992 participants (97 RCTs, 19,570 participants in meta‐analyses) for inclusion. Nineteen RCTs were conducted in low‐income countries, 27 in low‐middle‐income countries, 2 in middle‐income countries, 58 in upper‐middle‐income countries and 7 in mixed settings. Eighty‐three RCTs included adults and 30 RCTs included children. Cadres of primary‐level workers employed primary care health workers (38 studies), community workers (71 studies), both (2 studies), and not reported (2 studies). Interventions were universal prevention/promotion in 22 studies, selective in 36, and indicated prevention in 55 RCTs. Risk of bias The most common concerns over risk of bias were performance bias, attrition bias, and reporting bias. Intervention effects 'Probably', 'may', or 'uncertain' indicates 'moderate‐', 'low‐', or 'very low‐'certainty evidence. *Certainty of the evidence (using GRADE) was assessed at 0 to 1 month post‐intervention as specified in the review protocol. In the abstract, we did not report results for outcomes for which evidence was missing or very uncertain. Adults Promotion/universal prevention, compared...

show abstract

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Psychoeducation Given to Children with Parental Psychiatric Disorders

Cited by 4 publications

References 28 publications

Resilience in children of parents with mental illness, alcohol or substance misuse—An integrative review

Resilience in children of parents with mental illness, alcohol or substance misuse—An integrative review

Parenting interventions for people with schizophrenia or related serious mental illness

Primary-level and community worker interventions for the prevention of mental disorders and the promotion of well-being in low- and middle-income countries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About