2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Nurse-Led Continence Care Treatments for Chinese Primary Care Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Abstract: BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate whether community-based nurse-led continence care interventions are effective in improving outcomes for adult Chinese primary care patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).Research Design and SubjectsA case-controlled intervention study was conducted. An intervention group of 360 primary care patients enrolled into a nurse-led continence care programme were recruited by consecutive sampling. A control group of 360 primary care patients with LUTS identifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the study supplements our earlier work which evaluated the effectiveness of the programme over 12 months (Choi et al . ). Our findings helps to strengthen the evidence to support the effectiveness and sustainability of community‐based nursed led care in improving LUTS severity, HRQOL, general health perception and patient enablement over two years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The findings of the study supplements our earlier work which evaluated the effectiveness of the programme over 12 months (Choi et al . ). Our findings helps to strengthen the evidence to support the effectiveness and sustainability of community‐based nursed led care in improving LUTS severity, HRQOL, general health perception and patient enablement over two years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The intervention sites were independent of the researcher undertaking the evaluation research and have been previously described (Choi et al . ).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations