Evaluation of the effects of the radial constant-head boundary in slug tests

Dai, Yongqiang; Zhou, Zhifang; Zhao, Yanrong; Cui, Ziteng

doi:10.1007/s10040-015-1240-7

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The sampling scale of the slug tests is usually smaller than that of pumping tests. Previous studies indicated that this scale is inversely proportional to the storage coefficient and can be well approximated by r c = ffiffiffi S p (Beckie & Harvey, 2002;Dai et al, 2015;Karasaki et al, 1988), where r c is the radius of well casing. Therefore, the observation well should be located within the zone of influence and the scale of the 10.1029/2020WR027155…”

Section: Constant-head Boundarymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Numerical Study of Slug Tests in a Three‐Dimensional Heterogeneous Porous Aquifer Considering Well Inertial Effects

Liu

Bayer

et al. 2020

Water Resources Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The slug test is a common field technique for obtaining local hydraulic parameters near wells, applied, for example, for the hydrogeological investigation at contaminated sites. Although many slug test models have been developed for interpretation of measurements, only a few of them have considered heterogeneous conditions, and water column inertial effects are usually neglected. In this paper, we propose a novel three-dimensional slug test model (3DHIM) for application in heterogeneous aquifers, considering inertial effects associated with skin effects and linear friction forces. After comparison with existing analytical and numerical solutions of slug tests, the model is applied to an aquifer analog to simulate a series of slug tests. The results from single-well slug tests show that the well geometry (i.e., the well radius, well depth, and screen length) has an impact on the water level response. For cross-well slug tests, the results indicate that the water level fluctuations not only include information on the hydraulic signal propagation process in the aquifer but also on well characteristics, such as wellbore storage and inertial effects. These effects cause a phase shift and amplitude change of the water level fluctuation. As the observation and test wells have a good hydraulic connection and similar well geometry, the water level amplitude could be amplified relative to aquifer pressure at the measured position. Therefore, we suggest considering wellbore storage and in-well inertial effects in slug test-based subsurface investigations, otherwise the parameter estimates based on well water levels may include errors, particularly in highly permeable layers.

show abstract

Section: Constant-head Boundarymentioning

confidence: 99%