1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(83)80122-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the effects of carbon dioxide used as a pulpal test. Part 2. In vivo effect on canine enamel and pulpal tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
1
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings were similar to the Peters et al studies [27, 31, 32]. The in vitro portion of the study also showed that CO 2 snow only decreased the pulp temperature by less than 2°C after five seconds of application—a change that is not sufficient to damage the pulp, as Frank et al [34] estimated that pulp tissue is only irreversibly damaged after being frozen at approximately −9°C.…”
Section: Pulp Testing Techniques and Effectivenesssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The findings were similar to the Peters et al studies [27, 31, 32]. The in vitro portion of the study also showed that CO 2 snow only decreased the pulp temperature by less than 2°C after five seconds of application—a change that is not sufficient to damage the pulp, as Frank et al [34] estimated that pulp tissue is only irreversibly damaged after being frozen at approximately −9°C.…”
Section: Pulp Testing Techniques and Effectivenesssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Subsequently, to address this issue, a three part series of studies was reported by Peters et al [27, 31, 32]. In addition, both the in vitro and in vivo effects of exposure of low temperatures to the pulp and to the tooth structure were evaluated.…”
Section: Pulp Testing Techniques and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported that cold tests do not injure the pulp (Ingram & Peters 1983, Rickoff et al. 1988), whereas heat tests have a greater potential to cause injury (Cohen & Hargreaves 2006).…”
Section: Damage To the Soft And Hard Tissues Of The Toothmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DDM has decreased in popularity because of environmental concerns (13), and it has been replaced by other gases such as the mixture of propane, butane, and isobutane (Endo Frost [EF]; Roeko, Langenau, Germany). Concerns have been raised about possible damaging effects of cold testing agents to teeth, but studies have shown that they are safe (14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%