2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13246-011-0071-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the effects of gold nanoparticle shape and size on contrast enhancement in radiological imaging

Abstract: There has been increasing interest in the use of a nanoparticle-based media as a contrast-enhancement agent in medical imaging, particularly with gold Nanoparticles in radiography. Particularly attractive, is the prospect of modifying the surface of these materials with monoclonal antibodies to preferentially bind the nanoparticles to tumour sites. These materials differ from conventional molecular agents in their ability to be modified with cell specificity, or tailored for size and shape for maximum uptake. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial reports presented conflicting data, with one showing that the x-ray attenuation exhibited by smaller AuNPs (4 nm) was greater than larger particles (20, 40 and 60 nm) at the same concentration [36], and another showing no difference in x-ray attenuation between AuNPs of various sizes or shapes (spheres of ∼4, 6 and 25 nm, and rods of ∼30 nm diameter and ∼63 nm length) [84]. However, a recent report proved that x-ray attenuation is not influenced by AuNP size [32] by directly comparing the x-ray attenuation of AuNPs over a wide range of mean particle diameters (5, 13, 35 and 76 nm), including aqueous solutions of chloroauric acid com- Figure 5).…”
Section: Contrast Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial reports presented conflicting data, with one showing that the x-ray attenuation exhibited by smaller AuNPs (4 nm) was greater than larger particles (20, 40 and 60 nm) at the same concentration [36], and another showing no difference in x-ray attenuation between AuNPs of various sizes or shapes (spheres of ∼4, 6 and 25 nm, and rods of ∼30 nm diameter and ∼63 nm length) [84]. However, a recent report proved that x-ray attenuation is not influenced by AuNP size [32] by directly comparing the x-ray attenuation of AuNPs over a wide range of mean particle diameters (5, 13, 35 and 76 nm), including aqueous solutions of chloroauric acid com- Figure 5).…”
Section: Contrast Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hitherto, numerous analytical methods have been developed to investigate the effect of the particle size of a material on the X-ray attenuation for various incoming X-ray energies including scattered gammarays and X-rays [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. It is widely believed that nano-sized particles are able to disperse more uniformly within the matrix with less agglomerations when compared to micro-sized particles, thus improving the Xray attenuation ability of the material [6,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advances in synthesizing nanoparticle contrast agents (Hainfeld et al, 2006;Jackson et al, 2011;Mukundan et al, 2006;Rabin et al, 2006) have enabled high-resolution rodent studies using micro-CT. As imaging probes, these nanoparticlebased contrast agents have also opened the door for molecular CT imaging using various targeting strategies (Chanda et al, 2011;Cormode et al, 2010;Ghann et al, 2012;Popovtzer et al, 2008;Reuveni, 2011;Wyss et al, 2009). A liposomaliodinated (Lip-I) contrast agent has been used to image the tumor microenvironment with exquisite detail (Ghaghada et al, 2011;Moding et al, 2012).…”
Section: Mgmentioning
confidence: 99%