2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the efficacy of a commercial feed additive against the adverse effects of feed-borne deoxynivalenol (DON) on the performance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, follow-up experiments on rainbow trout followed that investigated, next to the effects of DON on performance, nitrogen and energy balances and carcass composition, effects of a commercial anti-mycotoxin additive [115], potential synergy among Fusarium toxins present in naturally contaminated trout feeds [116], the impact of diet composition on detoxification capacity, and species sensitivity in a comparison with tilapia [117]. Trout fingerings (initial weight; 1.8 g) exposed to natural DON for 12 weeks showed reduced feed intake, weight gain, TGC, reduced nitrogen retention efficiency (≥1000 µg/kg), and reduced retained nitrogen (≥1500 µg/kg) [115]. None of these effects could be reversed by the inclusion of a commercial feed additive, suggesting that anti-mycotoxin products developed for homeothermic species might not be as effective in cold-blooded species, such as trout.…”
Section: Rainbow Troutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, follow-up experiments on rainbow trout followed that investigated, next to the effects of DON on performance, nitrogen and energy balances and carcass composition, effects of a commercial anti-mycotoxin additive [115], potential synergy among Fusarium toxins present in naturally contaminated trout feeds [116], the impact of diet composition on detoxification capacity, and species sensitivity in a comparison with tilapia [117]. Trout fingerings (initial weight; 1.8 g) exposed to natural DON for 12 weeks showed reduced feed intake, weight gain, TGC, reduced nitrogen retention efficiency (≥1000 µg/kg), and reduced retained nitrogen (≥1500 µg/kg) [115]. None of these effects could be reversed by the inclusion of a commercial feed additive, suggesting that anti-mycotoxin products developed for homeothermic species might not be as effective in cold-blooded species, such as trout.…”
Section: Rainbow Troutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the awareness of mycotoxin-related issues in the industry has been raised again, mainly due to the increasing inclusion levels of plant meals in aquafeeds (Anater et al, 2016;Gonçalves et al, 2016;Gonçalves et al, 2017;Hooft, Bureau, 2017;Hooft et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth performance is one of the most prevalent clinical signs of DON across fish species. Building upon the current knowledge of the impact of DON in rainbow trout (Hooft, Bureau, 2017;Hooft, Elmor et al, 2011;Matejova et al, 2015;Ryerse et al, 2015), we have attempted to characterise reduced growth performance by exploring the impact of DON on ingredient digestibility. This was achieved by measuring total pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin, amylase and lipase activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mycotoxin contamination of finished feeds and raw materials used in aquaculture as well as the negative effects of mycotoxins on aquatic species, particularly rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss , have been highlighted in recent publications (Gonçalves, Navarro‐Guillén, et al, ; Hooft & Bureau, ; Hooft, Elmor, Encarnação, & Bureau, ; Ryerse, Hooft, Bureau, Hayes, & Lumsden, ; Tola et al, ). However, mycotoxin contamination is not generally assessed in commercial aquafeeds or plant meals used to manufacture these feeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trichothecenes are extremely potent inhibitors of eukaryotic protein synthesis, interfering with the initiation, elongation, and termination stages of this process (Kumar, Roy, Barman, & Anand, ). Knowledge of the effects of DON on aquatic species has increased recently (Gonçalves, Hofstetter, et al, ; Hooft & Bureau, ; Hooft et al, ; Matejova et al, ; Ryerse et al, ; Tola et al, ), and studies on rainbow trout suggest that DON has a detrimental effect on feed intake (FI), weight gain, and feed efficiency (Hooft et al, ; Ryerse et al, ). Curiously, no effect has been detected on the immune status of animals fed with DON (Matejova et al, ; Matejova, Svobodova, Vakula, Mares, & Modra, ; Ryerse et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%