2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Celeriac Fertilization with the Use of Slow-acting Fertilizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of agronomic efficiency index for cereal production in developing countries ranges from 10 to 30 kg of a product • kg -1 nitrogen fertilization (Dobermann, 2007). The value of agronomic efficiency index in individual variants of the experiment ranged between 6.16 and 35.92 kg • kg -1 expressed as Chinese cabbage dry matter yield, whereas Niemiec et al (2015a) reported the value of this parameter in conventional cultivation of celery to be approximately 20 kg • kg -1 . The manner of application of nitrogen fertilizers is one of the most effective methods of improving the efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen utilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The value of agronomic efficiency index for cereal production in developing countries ranges from 10 to 30 kg of a product • kg -1 nitrogen fertilization (Dobermann, 2007). The value of agronomic efficiency index in individual variants of the experiment ranged between 6.16 and 35.92 kg • kg -1 expressed as Chinese cabbage dry matter yield, whereas Niemiec et al (2015a) reported the value of this parameter in conventional cultivation of celery to be approximately 20 kg • kg -1 . The manner of application of nitrogen fertilizers is one of the most effective methods of improving the efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen utilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The slow-acting fertilizer was applied pointwise and in rows, approximately 5 cm below plant roots. Using slow-acting fertilizers directly under the root limited plant growth and increased differences in the size of individual plants, which is unfavorable from the point of view of the commercial quality of the product (Niemiec, 2014;Niemiec et al, 2015a). The experiment was set up on soil with the granulometric composition of sandy loam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the optimization of maize fertilization technology, the value of the discussed parameter increased from 37 kg N·kg-1 to 59 kg N·kg −1 under nitrogen fertilization at 140 kg N·kg −1 [24]. Niemiec et al [32] reported values of the efficiency coefficient of celery from 19.35 to 151.76 kg, depending on the fertilization variant, under intensive production conditions on a soil with high agronomic suitability. Amanullah and Almas [33] determined the value of this parameter at 28 to 55 kg·kg −1 of grain, depending on the applied fertilization strategy, while Li et al [34] achieved a more than double increase in the value of the productivity coefficient when introducing nitrogen fertilizers through the root.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors did not find any significant differences in shaping of this parameter between nutrient rich soils and nutrient poor soils. On the other hand, Xu et al [37] estimated the value of this parameter for rice production in developing countries, and it was about 13 kg of produce·kg −1 , while Niemiec et al [32] reported the value of this parameter for the conventional production of root celery to be about. 20 kg·kg −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%