2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Efficiency of a New File Removal System in Comparison With Two Conventional Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
39
2
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
39
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that the removal of fractured NiTi instruments is more influenced by factors such as degree of root canal curvature, radius of curvature, location of the fragment, and length of the fragment than the specific technique used (32). A clinician with more experience in separated file removal usually shows a higher success rate with less removed dentin structure than an inexperienced one (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that the removal of fractured NiTi instruments is more influenced by factors such as degree of root canal curvature, radius of curvature, location of the fragment, and length of the fragment than the specific technique used (32). A clinician with more experience in separated file removal usually shows a higher success rate with less removed dentin structure than an inexperienced one (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonsurgical removal usually cannot be accomplished when the entire segment of the broken instrument is apical to the curvature so that safe access with visualization is not possible [16,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical retrieval of fractured instruments from root canals has been largely reported in the literature, and many devices and methods have been proposed to accomplish that (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). However, those methods present some limitations related to canal morphology, reduction of root strength, and operator ability (6,7,16,19,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Consequently, a less complex retrieval method that causes minimum damage to the dental structures is necessary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%