2020
DOI: 10.1002/wer.1314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the efficiency of three different mineral adsorbents in the removal of pollutants in samples from a tropical spring in Northeastern Brazil

Abstract: Human water sources are increasingly threatened around the world due to various sources of pollution such as agriculture and industry. The objective of this study was to evaluate three new adsorbents as pollutant remedies for subsequent application in the Joanes River located in the State of Bahia in Brazil. The specific pollutants were nitrogen, phosphorus (P), aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), cyanobacteria, and saxitoxins. Initially, studies (pH 7 and 22°C) were performed with samples contaminated in the laboratory… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For trace or ultra-trace analysis of organic contaminants from water samples, pretreatment and pre-concentration are often required prior to the quantification [56], and extraction techniques such as solid-phase extraction (SPE) [25], magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) [11,18], and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [4] have been developed for the concentration of STX. On the other hand, for saxitoxin removal, the most common method is based on adsorption using granular activated carbon (GAC) [34], although other adsorbent materials have also been reported, such as polymeric resins [36], mineral residues [3,12], oyster shell powder [26], and algal polysaccharide gels [29]. However, complicated implementation procedures, low specificity and adsorption capacity, and poor reusability of the reported adsorbents prompt the development of novel highly efficient and recyclable materials for STX adsorption [21,25,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For trace or ultra-trace analysis of organic contaminants from water samples, pretreatment and pre-concentration are often required prior to the quantification [56], and extraction techniques such as solid-phase extraction (SPE) [25], magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) [11,18], and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [4] have been developed for the concentration of STX. On the other hand, for saxitoxin removal, the most common method is based on adsorption using granular activated carbon (GAC) [34], although other adsorbent materials have also been reported, such as polymeric resins [36], mineral residues [3,12], oyster shell powder [26], and algal polysaccharide gels [29]. However, complicated implementation procedures, low specificity and adsorption capacity, and poor reusability of the reported adsorbents prompt the development of novel highly efficient and recyclable materials for STX adsorption [21,25,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, I highly recommend other twelve equally excellent articles in the same issue. In the drinking water treatment aspect, three mineral adsorbents were studied for alleviation of multiple contaminants in source water in Northeastern Brazil (Guimarães Neto & Aguiar, 2020), while effects of coagulant types and doses, as well as water properties, were evaluated for coagulation removal of different engineered nanoparticles in water (Ramirez Arenas, Ramseier Gentile, Zimmermann, & Stoll, 2020). In the municipal wastewater treatment field, simultaneous nitrite‐shunt and biological phosphorus removal were demonstrated at low dissolved oxygen in a full‐scale high‐rate water reclamation facility (St. Petersburg, Florida) (Jimenez et al., 2020); and the process optimization and kinetic behaviors of the struvite precipitation for phosphorus removal and recovery were studied (Wang, Tian, Wang, & Yan, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%