2010
DOI: 10.2138/am.2010.3398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the elasticity normal to the basal plane of non-expandable 2:1 phyllosilicate minerals by nanoindentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14a) clay particles, although elastic deformation may also cause this Kanitpanyacharoen et al, 2015). In a nano-indentation test to determine the elasticity of single phyllosilicate minerals, Zhang et al (2010) suggest measurement artifacts caused by intracrystalline plasticity beneath the indenter tip. Particle bending next to shears can also be seen in TEM: Figure 14 displays a 500 nm thick, dragged mica.…”
Section: Intracrystalline Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14a) clay particles, although elastic deformation may also cause this Kanitpanyacharoen et al, 2015). In a nano-indentation test to determine the elasticity of single phyllosilicate minerals, Zhang et al (2010) suggest measurement artifacts caused by intracrystalline plasticity beneath the indenter tip. Particle bending next to shears can also be seen in TEM: Figure 14 displays a 500 nm thick, dragged mica.…”
Section: Intracrystalline Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 15a) clay particles, although elastic deformation may also cause this [Wenk et al, 2008;Kanitpanyacharoen et al, 2015]. In a nano-indentation test to determine the elasticity of single phyllosilicate minerals, Zhang et al [2010] suggest measurement artefacts caused by intracrystalline plasticity beneath the indenter tip. Particle bending next to shears can be seen also in TEM: Figure 15 displays 5 a 500 nm thick, dragged mica.…”
Section: Intracrystalline Plasticity 30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tendency of sink-in impressions increases with the increment of the annealing temperature, which makes the film become stiffer. No visible radial cracks developed for all the samples as that happened in muscovite, a naturally-formed nanostructured multilayer [40,41]. A partial lateral crack and a few raised grains on the surface of impression are observed in the AFM image shown in insert (a) of Figure 4.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%