2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the EUROIMMUN Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA Assay for detection of IgA and IgG antibodies

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
173
7
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
10
173
7
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the ELISA assay could exhibit cross-reactivity with antibodies to other seasonal human coronaviruses, some results may represent false positives, leading to overestimation of seroprevalence data [32]. The EUROIMMUN assay used in this study was evaluated in different studies showing a specificity ranging from 96.2% to 100% and sensitivity ranging from 86.4% to 100% [15,17,33]. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA can vary considerably depending on the timing of the sample, in particular from samples collected ≥4 days after COVID-19 diagnosis by PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because the ELISA assay could exhibit cross-reactivity with antibodies to other seasonal human coronaviruses, some results may represent false positives, leading to overestimation of seroprevalence data [32]. The EUROIMMUN assay used in this study was evaluated in different studies showing a specificity ranging from 96.2% to 100% and sensitivity ranging from 86.4% to 100% [15,17,33]. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA can vary considerably depending on the timing of the sample, in particular from samples collected ≥4 days after COVID-19 diagnosis by PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA can vary considerably depending on the timing of the sample, in particular from samples collected ≥4 days after COVID-19 diagnosis by PCR. The sensitivity can increase from 67% to 100% between samples analyzed at the time of PCR and samples analyzed at least four days later [15]. VNT, currently considered the gold standard, is the most specific serological assay capable of detecting true positive cases and functional neutralizing antibodies [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive percent agreement and Cohen’s Kappa were calculated to assess the performance of each assay with the positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR patients ( Whitman et al, 2020 , Beavis et al, 2020 ). Specificity and cross-reactivity of each assay were assessed using the pre-pandemic control samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of IgM and IgA in the two-step ELISA protocol were also explored, however IgM was found to have lower sensitivity with only 4/18 of the 7+ day COVID-19 samples being seropositive, compared with 18/18 (100%) for IgG. IgA was deemed unsuitable as the assay window was inferior to that of IgG (OD range 0.01-0.82 compared with 0.01-1.42), and recent reports highlighted reduced sensitivity and specificity for IgA based SARS-CoV-2 ELISA (Meyer et al, 2020;Beavis et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%