2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the formation of intermetallic compounds at the intermixing lines and in the nugget of dissimilar steel/aluminum friction stir welds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The IMC thickness formed during the friction stir butt welding of aluminum alloy to steel ranges between 0.25 and 5 µm [40][41][42]. This IMC thickness compared to that obtained in other studies [36] for aluminum steel FSW can be considered low. This is attributed to the low tool rotation rates used in this study which significantly reduced the heat input experienced during the welding process.…”
Section: Microstructure Analysismentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The IMC thickness formed during the friction stir butt welding of aluminum alloy to steel ranges between 0.25 and 5 µm [40][41][42]. This IMC thickness compared to that obtained in other studies [36] for aluminum steel FSW can be considered low. This is attributed to the low tool rotation rates used in this study which significantly reduced the heat input experienced during the welding process.…”
Section: Microstructure Analysismentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Due to the offset towards the aluminum side, it can be seen that both materials experienced sufficient stirring in the weld zone, where tiny steel fragments from the advanced side (AS) move to the retreating side (RS) and mixed with the Al, while the aluminum moves from the front of the tool to the back of the tool to generate the joint in the solid state. Recently, Abd Elnabi et al [36] conducted an experimental investigation to study the dissimilar FSW of pure aluminum AA1050 and annealed low carbon steel. They reported in their optimization step that all joints made at rotational speeds from 255 to 1225 rpm, traverse speed from 422 to 25 mm/min, and pin offset from 0 to 3 mm have sever surface defects.…”
Section: Mechanical Testing and Failure Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 shows the macrograph and schematic view of flow pattern in the welded joints in various cooling conditions. The conventional FSWed joint shows a smooth curvy interface between base metals and some stretch of steel in the aluminum side at the bottom of joint [ 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies and examinations have indicated that the cooling rate and peak temperature have significant effects on the joint mechanical features. For instance, the joint mechanical features will mostly depend on the final grain size, which is affected by heat input, whenever the welding peak temperature becomes lower than the phase transformation temperature [ 33 ]; while in different circumstances, when the welding peak temperature is higher than the phase transformation, the parameter which will play a significant role in the last phase composition and morphology is the cooling rate [ 34 ]. Furthermore, the grain structure before the phase transformation is very crucial [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%