2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the fracture toughness of brittle hardening materials by Vickers indentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of this mechanical parameter regarding models allows a comparative value, considering that the values of the fracture toughness are low, and indicates that the material is susceptible to failure by mechanical stress. In this sense, there are mathematical models based on computing to describe the fracture mechanisms by indentation method to determine parameter, which considers the variation of the models that have been used for the determination of this mechanical variable [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of this mechanical parameter regarding models allows a comparative value, considering that the values of the fracture toughness are low, and indicates that the material is susceptible to failure by mechanical stress. In this sense, there are mathematical models based on computing to describe the fracture mechanisms by indentation method to determine parameter, which considers the variation of the models that have been used for the determination of this mechanical variable [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystalline phase identification was carried out by means of X-ray diffraction (Panalytical X´Pert-PRO) patterns recorded using Cu radiation (λ Cu = 1.54056 Å) at 40 KV and 40 mA, in the range between 15° ≤ 2θ ≤ 100° with a step of 0.02°. The mechanical properties such as hardness and fracture toughness were evaluated by using the indentation method (EMCO-TEST DuraScan 20) [22,23]. Finally, the sintered materials were subjected to a thermal shock resistance test by heating samples to temperatures in the range between 900 and 1400°C (Yamato FO200CR) in intervals of 100°C and subsequent coolling in water at room temperature.…”
Section: Characterization Of Synthesized Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods such as Chevron Notch Beam (CNB) [ [11] , [12] , [13] ], Single-Edge Pre-cracked Beam (SEPB) [ 13 , 14 ], Single Edge Notch Beam (SENB) [ 14 , 15 ], Single Edge V-notch Beam (SEVNB) [ 16 , 17 ], Single Edge Laser Notch Beam (SELNB) [ 18 , 19 ], Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) [ [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] ], Wedge-insert Double Cantilever Beam (WDCB) [ 20 , 22 , 23 ], and End-Loaded Split (ELS) [ 24 , 25 ] are some of these techniques, and many of these methods have been used for many years to determine the K IC or K IFR of materials. In comparison, CFM is based on sharp indenters such as Vickers [ [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] ], Knoop [ [31] , [32] , [33] ], Berkovich [ 34 , 35 ], and Conical [ 36 ], which are applied to the sample in a certain period and amount of loading and are often used for brittle materials [ 34 , 36 ]. In general, the application of these techniques in the two groups varies according to the material, the manufacturing costs and testing of samples, and the required accuracy [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the application of these techniques in the two groups varies according to the material, the manufacturing costs and testing of samples, and the required accuracy [ 3 ]. However, the use of the IF technique to determine the K IFR of brittle materials, biomaterials, and hard biological tissues is more prevalent [ 26 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%