2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-94373-2_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Effects of AC Magnetic Field Exposure by Measurement of an FMD and a Microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, from the results of FMD test, the MF exposure significantly increased FMD values compared to the baseline value as well as compared to the sham exposure. The results were consistent with our previous findings investigated with smaller sample sizes [ 51 ]. As FMD is an indicator of vascular endothelial function and shear stress-induced nitric oxide (NO) production [ 62 64 ], the MF-induced increase of FMD values is largely related to enhancement of NO production [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, from the results of FMD test, the MF exposure significantly increased FMD values compared to the baseline value as well as compared to the sham exposure. The results were consistent with our previous findings investigated with smaller sample sizes [ 51 ]. As FMD is an indicator of vascular endothelial function and shear stress-induced nitric oxide (NO) production [ 62 64 ], the MF-induced increase of FMD values is largely related to enhancement of NO production [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, MF-induced increase in FMD values largely indicates enhancement of NO production and NO-mediated vasodilator response. The FMD values were evaluated before (baseline) and after 30-min exposure to MFs as described previously [ 51 ]. The CV values for the baseline FMD values in the same individual were within 30% across the four testing session: 15.1% ± 9.1% (mean ± SD), range 4.1–29.9%, n = 16.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations