Reclassification ofBacillus brevis was first described by Migula (1900). Subsequently, many strains, including some that were not in accordance with the criteria of Bacillus brevis sensu stricto, were classified as Bacillus brevis, according mainly to phenotype; as a result, Bacillus brevis has become a heterogeneous species, similar to Bacillus circulans (Nakamura & Swezey, 1983a, b). In the 1990s, based on polyphasic taxonomic studies of Bacillus brevis and its relatives, many species or strains were reclassified as novel species of the genera Brevibacillus and Aneurinibacillus (Nakamura, 1991(Nakamura, , 1993Takagi et al., 1993; Shida et al., 1994a Shida et al., , b, 1995Shida et al., , 1996 MeierStauffer et al., 1996;Heyndrickx et al., 1997). Recently, Brevibacillus invocatus was proposed as a novel species, according to the polyphasic identification of Bacillus and Brevibacillus strains from clinical, dairy and industrial specimens (Logan et al., 2002). Thus, at the time of writing, 11 species are recognized to belong to the genus Brevibacillus and three species are recognized to belong to the genus Aneurinibacillus. However, with the exception of the thermophilic species Brevibacillus thermoruber and Aneurinibacillus thermoaerophilus, distinguishing between these species is extremely difficult, as most strains are unreactive or weak in many biochemical tests and few have useful differential phenotypic characteristics (Heyndrickx Abbreviation: HV, hypervariable.