Evaluation of the i-gel airway in 300 patients

Bamgbade, Olumuyiwa A.; Macnab, W. Ross; Khalaf, Wael

doi:10.1017/s0265021508004511

Cited by 51 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…), and this finding is in agreement with the results of Trivedi [17], Van Zundert [11], Bamgbade [18] and Radhika [19] previously discussed.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…Bamgbade and colleagues [18] reported that the I-gel Rehab Abdel Raof Abdel Aziz and Yasser Mohamed Osman: Comparison of I-gel with Baska Mask Airway for Controlled Ventilation in Obese Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial could be inserted within 5 seconds in 290 out of 300 patients, but they did not specify how insertion time was defined. Radhika, et al [19] in their study, compared LMA-S versus Igel in 42 patients were randomly divided into two groups.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of I-gel with Baska Mask Airway for Controlled Ventilation in Obese Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Aziz¹,

Osman²

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The ideal supraglottic airway device must have high airway seal pressures during spontaneous and positive pressure ventilation also low resistance to the flow of gases. This study compared the utility of I-Gel with Baska Mask during general anesthesia in obese patients undergoing elective ambulatory surgeries. The study was conducted on sixty obese patients with body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25 and ≤ 40 kg.m 2 , ASA I, II, III, 18-60 years old of either sex scheduled for short duration (<3 hr). I-gel was successfully inserted in 25 patients on the first attempt and in 2 patients on the second attempt (overall success rate = 90%). Baska mask was successfully inserted in 27 patients on the first attempt and in 2 patients on the second attempt (overall success rate = 96.97%). Successful insertion time was significantly shorter in the I-gel group. Oropharyngeal sealing pressure (OSP) was significantly higher following Baska mask insertion. Intra-and postoperative airway morbidity rates were not significantly different between both groups. So Concluded that both I-gel and Baska mask are suitable for ventilation in obese patients, but Baska mask gave a better laryngeal seal.

show abstract

“…), and this finding is in agreement with the results of Trivedi [17], Van Zundert [11], Bamgbade [18] and Radhika [19] previously discussed.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of I-gel with Baska Mask Airway for Controlled Ventilation in Obese Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Aziz¹,

Osman²

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Various studies have reported a median insertion time for the i-gel ranging from 5 to 15 sec (14,16,18).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Comparison of I-Gel Supraglottic Airway Device and Cuffed Endotracheal Tube for Pressure-Controlled Ventilation During Routine Surgical Procedures

Dhanda¹,

Singh²,

Bhalotra³

et al. 2017

Turk J Anaesth Reanim

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Numerous previous studies of these airway devices have demonstrated their easy, reliable insertion and low morbidity rate. (3)(4)(5)(6)(7) However, comparative studies involving all three aforementioned airway devices are lacking. One study testing the three devices used the laryngoscope-guided and gastric tubeguided methods of insertion, while another was conducted on paralysed, ventilated patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery

Liew

Shah

et al. 2016

smedj

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTIONThe LMA Supreme™, i-gel ® and LMA ProSeal™ are second-generation supraglottic airway devices. We tested the hypothesis that these devices differ in performance when used for spontaneous ventilation during anaesthesia.METHODS 150 patients who underwent general anaesthesia for elective surgery were randomly allocated into three groups. Data was collected on oropharyngeal leak pressures, ease and duration of device insertion, ease of gastric tube insertion, and airway safety. RESULTSLeak pressure, our primary outcome measure, was found to be higher for the i-gel than the Supreme and ProSeal (mean ± standard error of the mean: 27.31 ± 0.92 cmH 2 O, 23.60 ± 0.70 cmH 2 O and 24.44 ± 0.70 cmH 2 O, respectively; p = 0.003). Devices were inserted on the first attempt for 90%, 82% and 72% of patients in the i-gel, Supreme and ProSeal groups, respectively (p = 0.105); mean device placement times were 23.58 seconds, 25.10 seconds and 26.34 seconds, respectively (p = 0.477). Gastric tubes were inserted on the first attempt in 100% of patients in the Supreme group, and 94% of patients in the i-gel and ProSeal groups (p = 0.100). There was blood staining on removal in 9 (18%) patients in each of the Supreme and ProSeal groups, with none in the i-gel group (p = 0.007). The incidence of postoperative sore throat, dysphagia and hoarseness was lowest for the i-gel. CONCLUSIONThe three devices were comparable in terms of ease and duration of placement, but the i-gel had higher initial oropharyngeal leak pressure and lower airway morbidity compared with the ProSeal and Supreme.

show abstract

Evaluation of the i-gel airway in 300 patients

Cited by 51 publications

References 3 publications

Comparison of I-gel with Baska Mask Airway for Controlled Ventilation in Obese Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Comparison of I-gel with Baska Mask Airway for Controlled Ventilation in Obese Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Clinical Comparison of I-Gel Supraglottic Airway Device and Cuffed Endotracheal Tube for Pressure-Controlled Ventilation During Routine Surgical Procedures

Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About