2017
DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Mycoplasma genitalium Resistance Plus kit for the detection of M. genitalium and mutations associated with macrolide resistance

Abstract: The ResistancePlus assay generally performed well in comparison to methods currently employed at the reference laboratory. It detected a range of different mutations; however, a small number of specimens that were genotyped as macrolide resistant by Sanger sequencing were either not detected by the assay or were genotyped as susceptible. This could impact on treatment outcomes if assay results were used for patient management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, false-negative results from the resistance PCR assay may account for some failures of azithromycin in cases thought to be macrolide susceptible. Published evaluations of the ResistancePlus assay have varied in their methods, likely explaining some variation in reported sensitivity, but false-negative results do occur [21, 26, 27]. Clinicians should be aware of this limitation, particularly when confronted by unexpectedly macrolide-susceptible cases such as after azithromycin treatment failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, false-negative results from the resistance PCR assay may account for some failures of azithromycin in cases thought to be macrolide susceptible. Published evaluations of the ResistancePlus assay have varied in their methods, likely explaining some variation in reported sensitivity, but false-negative results do occur [21, 26, 27]. Clinicians should be aware of this limitation, particularly when confronted by unexpectedly macrolide-susceptible cases such as after azithromycin treatment failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 7 , 10 ] New tests including detection of azithromycin resistance in MG were recently CE labeled. [ 11 , 12 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibiotic resistance screening. Mutations (A2058G, A2058C, A2058T, A2059G, and A2059C) within the macrolide resistance-determining region (MRDR) of the 23S rRNA gene were detected using a commercially available kit (the ResistancePlus MG kit; SpeeDx, Sydney, Australia) (21)(22)(23). The kit is TGA approved and CE-IVD marked; however, it is not currently for sale in the United States.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%