2021
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00937-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the ImmuView RSV Test for Rapid Detection of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Adult Patients with Influenza-Like Symptoms

Abstract: By timely RSV diagnosis among patients with influenza-like symptoms, especially when influenza diagnostics turn negative, it is possible to prevent unnecessary antibiotic usage as well as reduce diagnostic testing, nosocomial transmission, and hospital stay. Previous rapid RSV tests have demonstrated poor sensitivity in adults, and we could demonstrate that the novel ImmuView RSV test similarly showed limited value for diagnosing RSV infection in adult patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for RSV diagnosis, its widespread use in Latin America is hindered by its cost, limited availability, and need for specialized equipment and expertise [ 46 , 47 ]. Over recent years, rapid antigen detection test (RADT) options have been made available for RSV; although RADTs have modest sensitivity compared with RT-PCR, they are easy and quick to perform, making them valuable diagnostic tools (particularly in children) where access to RT-PCR may be limited [ 47 , 48 ]. Early use of RADTs is important, as prolonged symptoms are associated with false-negative test results [ 49 ]; however, the cost and necessity of RADTs should also be evaluated.…”
Section: Underdiagnosis Of Rsvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for RSV diagnosis, its widespread use in Latin America is hindered by its cost, limited availability, and need for specialized equipment and expertise [ 46 , 47 ]. Over recent years, rapid antigen detection test (RADT) options have been made available for RSV; although RADTs have modest sensitivity compared with RT-PCR, they are easy and quick to perform, making them valuable diagnostic tools (particularly in children) where access to RT-PCR may be limited [ 47 , 48 ]. Early use of RADTs is important, as prolonged symptoms are associated with false-negative test results [ 49 ]; however, the cost and necessity of RADTs should also be evaluated.…”
Section: Underdiagnosis Of Rsvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular and accurate method to identify hMPV is reverse transcriptase PCR assays, which amplify the viral RNA. Targets commonly used include F, N, G, L, and M. The F and N genes are considered more specific and conserved for identifying hMPV [59,60].…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Hmpvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study is limited by the lack of multicentre analysis, which makes these findings less generalisable, despite the relatively large number of patients included. Secondly, we did not perform molecular studies in each patient, and a classification into RSV versus non-RSV group based only on a negative rapid antigen test result is questionable; antigen tests are characterised by high specificity (above 90%) but lower sensitivity, reaching about 70%, although there are studies showing both much higher and much lower sensitivities (41)(42)(43)(44) . The lack of identification of other aetiological factors is, in our opinion, the most important shortcoming of the study, as it would not only reduce the risk of false negative RSV test results, but also the differentiation between certain agents (generally classified as non-RSV) may play a crucial role in the future.…”
Section: Multivariate Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%