Optical Fiber Communication Conference 2016
DOI: 10.1364/ofc.2016.tu2h.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Impact of Different SDM Switching Strategies in a Network Planning Scenario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bundles of SMFs are assumed throughout the study since they permit a fair comparison of Ind-Sw, J-Sw and FrJ-Sw due to the absence of XT between spatial dimensions, as explained above. Assuming bundles of 12 SMFs, we showed in [15] that the performance of SG-Sw cases becomes similar to that of Ind-Sw as the total offered load to the network (hereinafter referred to as load) increases, while SG-Sw cases bring up to 50% cost savings compared to the Ind-Sw case. However, SG-Sw cases showed a reduced performance for low values of load.…”
Section: Related Work and Novelty Of The Papermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Bundles of SMFs are assumed throughout the study since they permit a fair comparison of Ind-Sw, J-Sw and FrJ-Sw due to the absence of XT between spatial dimensions, as explained above. Assuming bundles of 12 SMFs, we showed in [15] that the performance of SG-Sw cases becomes similar to that of Ind-Sw as the total offered load to the network (hereinafter referred to as load) increases, while SG-Sw cases bring up to 50% cost savings compared to the Ind-Sw case. However, SG-Sw cases showed a reduced performance for low values of load.…”
Section: Related Work and Novelty Of The Papermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Going back to SDM, several previous works (e.g., [3][4][5]18,19]) highlighted the need to realize flexibility/cost trade-offs in SDM ROADM designs, due to the extremely high cost of supporting fully flexible switching in both the spatial and spectral domains. Three different switching paradigms are described in the literature [3]: 1) independent switching (InS), in which demands can be switched freely in both spectrum and space, is the most flexible but also the most complex and expensive to realize, requiring a huge number of WSSs; 2) joint switching (JoS), where space is a degenerate dimension that is switched as a single spatial group (i.e., a certain piece of spectrum across all spatial dimensions in an input port is routed toward the same output port), is far simpler and cheaper to realize (it requires a single WSS per degree per direction, far less than InS [3,5]), but is also far less flexible, equivalent to having a single spatial dimension for routing purposes (i.e., it has a huge increase in minimum traffic granularity, equivalent to the number of jointly switched spatial dimensions); and 3) fractional-joint switching (FJoS) offers a middle ground between the other two options, by switching sub-groups of spatial dimensions (which we just call "spatial groups," plural, visually outlined in Fig.…”
Section: Sdm Switching Paradigms and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for example, realizing a four-degree ROADM, with nine spatial dimensions, would require using WSSs with a minimum port count of 9 × 1 × 4, i.e., 45 ports. That said, the increase in unitary cost associated with higher port count WSSs would be counteracted by a significantly smaller number of WSSs required in the ROADM architecture [4]; in the aforementioned example, InS would require 72 1 × 3 WSSs, while JoS would need only eight, but of port count 9 × 27 [assuming a design without a dedicated add/drop (A/D) degree]. Taking into account that, historically, the cost per port of single-mode WSSs has been inversely proportional to the port count [20], we expect that telecom operators could derive substantial benefits by exploiting (F)JoS in a SDM network scenario.…”
Section: Sdm Switching Paradigms and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In SS-FONs, there are generally three mechanisms for switching from one core to another, which are highly correlated with the different types of fibers introduced for SDM networks [4]; independent switching (Ind-Sw), where all cores can be independently directed to any other core, joint switching (J-Sw), where each core can switch to only one core, and fractional joint switching (Fr J-Sw), a hybrid approach where a group of cores can be directed to another specific group of cores. Each switching mechanism offers benefits and drawbacks regarding performance, flexibility, and hardware cost as described in detail in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%