Evaluation of the Impact of Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement on Crestal Bone: A Comparative Study

Jalaluddin, Mohammad; Mailankote, Shilpa; Soans, Crystal Runa; Awasthi, Naman; Felix, Cathryn Bp

doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1857

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Crestal bone resorption represents one of the most critical parameters for postoperative implant success [1][2]. In accordance with the established standards used to assess implant success and survival, the level of marginal bone changes during the early time mostly in the first year should be less than 1.5 mm [3][4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Crestal Bone Change Following Immediate and Delayed Placement of Dental Implant

2023

JPTCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Resorption of Crestal bone after implant placement is considered one of the most important parameters for implant success. Immediate implant placed in the extraction socket for reducing treatment time. Aim: this study was aiming to make comparison between the immediate and delayed placement of dental implant in the Crestal bone width in bucco-lingual direction clinically and radiographically by using the cone beam computed tomography. Method: A total of fifteen patients with 38 dental implants were taken in the study and they were splitted into two groups: first group of immediate implants had 18 implant cases, on the other hand second group of delayed implant placement included 20 implant cases that placed six to eight weeks after extraction. The space between the buccal and lingual bones was measured clinically and radiographically in the same time of placement of implant and repeated after 6 months, at 2nd stage surgery during abutment placement. Results: Thirty-eight implant in this study, fifteen cases were placed in mandible, and twenty-three cases in the maxilla. At the time of implant placement, the mean distance from buccal to the lingual bone for immediate implant cases was (9.27 mm ∓ SD 1.02) and (8.75 mm ∓ SD 0.77) for delayed implants. CBCT readings showed (8.98 mm ∓ SD 1.01) and (8.51 mm ∓ SD 0.74) respectively. At the second surgery, the mean distance from buccal to the lingual bone was (7.74 mm ∓ SD 0.96) for an immediate

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Crestal Bone Change Following Immediate and Delayed Placement of Dental Implant

2023

JPTCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Evaluation of the Impact of Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement on Crestal Bone: A Comparative Study

Cited by 1 publication

References 12 publications

Comparison of Crestal Bone Change Following Immediate and Delayed Placement of Dental Implant

Comparison of Crestal Bone Change Following Immediate and Delayed Placement of Dental Implant

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About