Evaluation of the impact of the ARC program on national nursing and midwifery regulations, leadership, and organizational capacity in East, Central, and Southern Africa

Abstract

BackgroundThe African Health Professions Regulatory Collaborative (ARC) was launched in 2011 to support countries in East, Central, and Southern Africa to safely and sustainably expand HIV service delivery by nurses and midwives. While the World Health Organization recommended nurse initiated and managed antiretroviral therapy, many countries in this region had not updated their national regulations to ensure nurses and midwives were authorized and trained to provide essential HIV services. For four years, ARC awarded annual grants, convened regional meetings, and provided technical assistance to country teams of nursing and midwifery leaders to improve national regulations related to safe HIV service delivery. We examined the impact of the program on national regulations and the leadership and organizational capacity of country teams.MethodsData was collected to quantify the level of participation in ARC by each country (number of grants received, number of regional meetings attended, and amount of technical assistance received). The level of participation was analyzed according to two primary outcome measures: 1) changes in national regulations and 2) improvements in leadership and organizational capacity of country teams. Changes in national regulations were defined as advancement of one “stage” on a capability maturity model; nursing and midwifery leadership and organizational capacity was measured by a group survey at the end of the program.ResultsSeventeen countries participated in ARC between 2012 and 2016. Thirty-three grants were awarded; the majority addressed continuing professional development (20; 61%) and scopes of practice (6; 18%). Fourteen countries (representing approximately two-thirds of grants) progressed at least one stage on the capability maturity model. There were significant increases in all five domains of leadership and organizational capacity (p < 0.01). The number of grants (Kendall’s tau = 0.56, p = 0.02), duration of technical assistance (Kendall’s tau = 0.50, p = 0.03), and number of learning sessions attended (Kendall’s tau = 0.46, p = 0.04) were significantly associated with improvements in in-country collaboration between nursing and midwifery organizations.ConclusionsThe ARC program improved national nursing regulations in participating countries and increased reported leadership, organizational capacity, and collaboration among national nursing and midwifery organizations. These changes help ensure national policies and professional regulations underpin nurse initiated and managed treatment for people living with HIV.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3233-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Regulation of nursing professionals in Cambodia: strategies to overcome underpinning challenges

“…A qualitative descriptive approach with conventional content analysis was used to fulfil the aims of this study. This paper applies the same framework for assessing the development of the regulatory system, as described in our earlier contribution (Fujita et al 2019) and as adapted from the work of McCarthy et al (Gross et al 2018; Gross et al 2015; McCarthy et al 2014) and the Regulatory Board Governance Toolkit (Barry 2014). The adapted framework covers eight regulatory functions, namely (1) nursing legislation, (2) accreditation of pre‐service training, (3) competency assessment, (4) registration and licensing systems, (5) tools and data flows concerning registration and licensing, (6) scope of practice, (7) continuing professional development (CPD) and (8) establishment of a code of ethics.…”

Regulation of nursing practice in the Region of the Americas

“…This initiative was able to strengthen nursing regulations, especially addressing continuing professional development and scopes of practice. As a result, there were significant increases in leadership and organizational capacity (34). The success of the ARC shows promise that targeted interventions could be used to improve not just nursing regulations and advanced nursing roles but also the regulation of all health professionals.…”

Regulation of nursing professionals in Cambodia and Vietnam: a review of the evolution and key influences

“…Collected information was synthesized to produce a chronologic overview of advances in regulatory functions during the period 2000–2017 (Additional files 1 and 2). An adapted version of the regulatory function framework (RFF) (Table 1) developed by McCarthy et al [8–10] and the Regulatory Board Governance Toolkit [7] was used to objectively assess advances in core regulatory functions [9]. The assessment was validated through published and synthesized data and triangulated with insights from those authors based on their field experience working on nursing administration and education in Cambodia and Vietnam.…”

“…The stages range from nonexistent or minimal (Stage 0) to high (Stage 4) capability and are defined in line with regional or global recommendations (Table 1). Each stage is characterized by key features that contribute elements and at times prerequisites for advancing to the next stage [10]. The authors analyzed the chronological progress of regulatory development and determined the stage that best characterized the status of each regulatory function in 2000 (start year of analysis) and in 2017.…”