Evaluation of the impact of PEPFAR transition on retention in care in South Africa’s Western Cape

Abstract

Background: Research on the impact of the PEPFAR transition in South Africa (SA) in 2012 found varying results in retention in care (RIC) of people living with HIV (PLWH). Objectives: We investigated the factors that impacted RIC during the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) transition in Western Cape, South Africa in 2012. Methods: We used aggregate data from 61 facilities supported by four non-governmental organizations from to 2007-2015. The main outcome was RIC at 12-months after antiretroviral therapy initiation for two time periods. We used quantile regression to estimate the effect of the PEPFAR pull-out and other predictors on RIC. The models were adjusted for various covariates. Results: Regression models (50th quantile) for 12-month RIC showed a 4.6% (95%CI: -8.4, -0.8%) decline in RIC post direct service. Facilities supported by Anova/Kheth'impilo fared worst post PEFPAR; a decline in RIC of (-5.8%; 95% CI: -9.7, -1.8%), while that'sit fared best (6.3% increase in RIC; 95% CI:2.5,10.1%). There was a decrease in RIC when comparing urban to rural areas (-5.8%; 95% CI: -10.1, -1.5%). City of Cape town combined with Western Cape Government Health facilities showed a substantial decrease (-9.1%; 95% CI: -12.3, -5.9%), while community health clinic (vs. primary health clinic) declined slightly (-4.4; 95% CI: -9.6, 0.9%) in RIC. We observed no RIC difference by facility size and a slight increase when two or more human resources transitioned from PEPFAR to the government. Conclusions: When PEPFAR funding decreased in 2012, there was a decrease in RIC. To ensure the continuity of HIV care when a major funder withdraws sufficient and stable transition resources, investment in organizations that understand the local context, joint planning, and coordination are required.

Integrating interventions supported by development assistance for health into local health system: evidence from a China–World Bank–UK rural health system strengthening project (1998–2007)

“… 6 9–16 These policies are guided by ‘Sustainability Doctrine’, which emphasises capacity building within recipient countries, seeks to prevent aid dependency and backs initiatives that are expected to continue beyond the cessation of donor funding. 3 9 17 18 In this scenario, maintaining the endline achieved by DAH is synonymous with sustainability, 3 17 a topic that researchers have comprehensively examined in terms of its outcomes 19–21 and the factors that facilitate or hinder such ‘sustainability’. 22–25 …”