2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on reducing rear-end collision risks on freeways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard deviation of speed, as a Safety Surrogate Assessment Model (SSAM) (Lee et al, 2014;Li et al, 2017), has been used to assess the safety performance (Gettman and Head, 2003). Generally, a lower value in the standard deviation of speed represents a more stable traffic flow (Songchitruksa et al, 2016).…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard deviation of speed, as a Safety Surrogate Assessment Model (SSAM) (Lee et al, 2014;Li et al, 2017), has been used to assess the safety performance (Gettman and Head, 2003). Generally, a lower value in the standard deviation of speed represents a more stable traffic flow (Songchitruksa et al, 2016).…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the predecessor is a platoon member itself, it checks with the maximum allowed platoon to see if platoon formation is allowed. The maximum platoon size is usually limited to 10 in literature (Songchitruksa et al, 2016;Li et al, 2017). We test with no restriction on the maximum size so as observe the maximum sized platoon that can be formed in this ad-hoc setting.…”
Section: Modeling Cacc Platoonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the follower is in gap closing mode, we use the car-following model used by Songchitruksa et al (2016), which is as follows: When the difference between current space gap and desired space gap drops below 20 m, the follower switches to CACC control mode where the behavior is described by the model proposed by Li et al (2017): a n tzt d ð Þ~a acc zl 1 a 1 t ð Þzl n{1 a n{1 (t) ðEq: 7:6Þ…”
Section: Modeling Cacc Platoonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire system showed good performance in testing real-world scenarios, both in computer simulation and with real vehicles.Shladover et al analyzed the advantages of cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) based on cooperative communication including higher accuracy, faster response, and shorter gaps, resulting in enhanced traffic flow stability and possibly improved safety [40]. Li et al developed a V2I integrated system that incorporated both adaptive cruise control (ACC) and variable speed limit (VSL) to reduce rear-end collision risks on freeways [41,42], and the intelligent driver model (IDM) was used to simulate intelligent vehicles' behavior [41][42][43][44]. Moreover, Dey et al demonstrated the potential of V2I in a heterogeneous wireless network with variable communication techniques that guaranteed the optimal utilization of available communication options and minimized the corresponding backhaul communication infrastructure requirements while considering CAV application requirements [45].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%