2021
DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2021.1946844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the in vitro stability of direct oral anticoagulants in blood samples under different storage conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although studies have shown that samples for DOAC monitoring with functional coagulation assays can be stored for 24 hours at room temperature before testing without loss of stability, 22 in vitro stability of DOACs stored at room temperature is significantly longer. 13 Direct measurement of DOAC concentration in plasma samples by chromatographic methods may, therefore, be necessary for monitoring treatment with DOACs outside the hospital setting when such quantification is indicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although studies have shown that samples for DOAC monitoring with functional coagulation assays can be stored for 24 hours at room temperature before testing without loss of stability, 22 in vitro stability of DOACs stored at room temperature is significantly longer. 13 Direct measurement of DOAC concentration in plasma samples by chromatographic methods may, therefore, be necessary for monitoring treatment with DOACs outside the hospital setting when such quantification is indicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the other studies investigating the stability of DOAC in whole blood patient samples, 9 12 the main strengths of our studies were: the coverage of a wider range of anti-Xa activities; the measurement of these activities with two different commercial reagents in two different laboratories; the inclusion of a larger number of samples; and, finally, a more stringent acceptability range (± 15% instead of ± 20%), consistent with international guidelines. 7 We chose not to investigate DOAC stability over 6 hours, as in routine practice all samples can be analyzed within this delay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nonetheless, studies that are directed to determine intra- and inter-individual variation for DOACs are lacking, as is common for almost all drugs. Based on the study by Reda et al, inter-individual biological variations for various DOACs exceed 40% at peak and 60% at trough concentrations and intra-individual CV above 20%, so the acceptable CV was set at 20% even though the analytical CV was below 10% [ 30 , 31 , 33 ]. It is essential to take into consideration that the lower concentrations had higher deviations from baseline values in percentages, but clinically, this was not significant, e.g., the sample’s baseline value was 24 ng/mL with 37.5% deviations on the third day, which meant 33 ng/mL ( Table 2 and Table 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the statistical tests were two-sided using a significance level of 0.05. Acceptable stability was defined as 80–120% of the baseline result, and any deviation greater than 20% was considered clinically significant [ 30 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%