2007
DOI: 10.1186/1743-8454-4-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the IS6110 PCR assay for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis

Abstract: Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is one of the common clinical manifestations of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. It is difficult to diagnose due to a lack of rapid, sensitive, and specific tests. Newer methods, which are easy and reliable, are required to diagnose TBM at an early stage. Thus our aim was to evaluate the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, using primers directed against the IS6110 gene, for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the CSF, for the diagnosis of TBM patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The study was relatively large (31 definite TBM cases) compared to those in published reports, where the numbers of cultureconfirmed CSF samples were relatively small (17-21). The sensitivity was not improved and remained suboptimal despite our use of fairly large volumes of CSF (500 l for the Amplicor PCR and 1,000 l for the Xpert MTB/RIF) compared to those in previous studies (22)(23)(24)(25)(26). A meta-analysis by Solomons et al confirmed sensitivities varying from 33% to 67% (27) Previously cited reasons for the suboptimal sensitivity have included the presence of inhibitors in the CSF, paucibacillary samples below the detection limit of the assay, and the aliquot phenomenon (i.e., the initial CSF sample taken may have fewer bacilli than those taken later).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The study was relatively large (31 definite TBM cases) compared to those in published reports, where the numbers of cultureconfirmed CSF samples were relatively small (17-21). The sensitivity was not improved and remained suboptimal despite our use of fairly large volumes of CSF (500 l for the Amplicor PCR and 1,000 l for the Xpert MTB/RIF) compared to those in previous studies (22)(23)(24)(25)(26). A meta-analysis by Solomons et al confirmed sensitivities varying from 33% to 67% (27) Previously cited reasons for the suboptimal sensitivity have included the presence of inhibitors in the CSF, paucibacillary samples below the detection limit of the assay, and the aliquot phenomenon (i.e., the initial CSF sample taken may have fewer bacilli than those taken later).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Also, we evaluated these two Hsps simultaneously to study the combined positivity and negativity. In addition to that, we have compared the results of M. tb Hsp 71 with that of the in house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (Deshpande et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Recently, another study that performed PCR using primers directed against the IS6110 gene reported the sensitivity of 91.4% and specificity of 75.9% for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. 5) Both QFT and PCR have advantages and limitations. Given their advantages and non-invasive nature, we consider that QFT and PCR should be performed whenever intracranial tuberculoma is suspected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%