2018
DOI: 10.7812/tpp/18-101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Learning to Integrate Neighborhoods and Clinical Care Project: Findings from Implementing a New Lay Role into Primary Care Teams to Address Social Determinants of Health

Abstract: The authors identified 1,800,948 patients who made 2,326,701 health care encounters eligible for HIV testing before implementation (1/08-6/12) and 1,362,479 eligible encounters after implementation (1/13-6/15). The sameday HIV testing rate increased from 36.7% to 44.1%, a significant increase. The positive test result rate increased from 0.02% to 0.04% (p < 0.001). During the postimplementation period, fewer HIVinfected patients had a CD4+ cell count below 200 and/or HIV viral load of 10,000 copies/mL or highe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings also provide concrete examples of the valuable role that practice staff such as care managers play in facilitating efforts to address social needs. Several recent studies and reports have emphasised the need to invest in practice staff whose roles include a focus on identifying and assisting patients with HRSN (Bryant et al., 2020; Ellis et al., 2021; Hsu et al., 2018; Islam et al., 2020; Kovach et al., 2019; Rojas L & Project S, 2020). Indeed, our findings suggest that staff members’ skills in relationship‐building and empathetic understanding of their patients’ lived realities are pivotal to a practice's success in connecting patients with resources and assistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings also provide concrete examples of the valuable role that practice staff such as care managers play in facilitating efforts to address social needs. Several recent studies and reports have emphasised the need to invest in practice staff whose roles include a focus on identifying and assisting patients with HRSN (Bryant et al., 2020; Ellis et al., 2021; Hsu et al., 2018; Islam et al., 2020; Kovach et al., 2019; Rojas L & Project S, 2020). Indeed, our findings suggest that staff members’ skills in relationship‐building and empathetic understanding of their patients’ lived realities are pivotal to a practice's success in connecting patients with resources and assistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 Community health workers are increasingly used in primary care settings to assist with social and economic needs; however, research surrounding integration of these personnel into oncology settings is limited. 25 It is possible that use of such peer-based workers in underserved settings may be a cost-effective solution for alleviating cancer provider burden (as has been demonstrated in primary care settings 26 and, to some extent, cancer care settings [18][19][20][21] ); however, role clarity on the cancer care team and training for cancer care providers on how to best use these personnel will be essential for their integration. Further research is necessary to understand under what conditions such personnel can be optimally used to reduce cancer care disparities and improve outcomes.…”
Section: Responders (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interventions were implemented in various settings for hospital-based initiatives, including post hospital discharge [221] , the emergency department [222], and clinics specializing in different medical disciplines [223][224][225][226][227]. On the other hand, community-based initiatives concentrated mainly on integrating interventions into primary care services [228][229][230][231]. The social and healthcare supportive programs included a range of initiatives designed towards improving community health.…”
Section: Sdoh Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health outcomes, such as improvements in health metrics, reductions in disease incidence, changes in vital signs, and quality of life, are commonly used as measures to determine the feasibility of initiating an intervention (n = 10). Several studies have also assessed social SDoH in relation to patient satisfaction and acceptability [230,235,237,238]. Since most programs were new efforts, it was not possible to determine the effectiveness of the intervention in the short term, nor could the potential generalizability be assessed.…”
Section: Sdoh Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%