2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of partially crystallized versus fully crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate CAD-CAM crowns: An in vitro comparison of the silicone replica technique, direct view, and 3-dimensional superimposition analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the crystallization process, the lithium silicate and meta-silicate crystals become smaller, and densification increases with a reduction in particle size for a close-packed arrangement [42]. Previous studies reported that densification shrinkage during the crystallization process affects the adaptation of ZLS crowns [8,24]. However, our study found no significant differences between VS and CD.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the crystallization process, the lithium silicate and meta-silicate crystals become smaller, and densification increases with a reduction in particle size for a close-packed arrangement [42]. Previous studies reported that densification shrinkage during the crystallization process affects the adaptation of ZLS crowns [8,24]. However, our study found no significant differences between VS and CD.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…An inappropriate internal gap can increase the thickness of the cement, decrease the adhesive strength at the adhesive interface, and reduce the resistance to fracture of the restoration [1,5,6]. Marginal gaps of ≤ 120 μm and internal gaps of ≤ 200 μm have traditionally been considered clinically acceptable [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to the present moment, data regarding clinical performances of ZLS are limited, with a short term evaluation of full and partial coverage indirect restorations indicating a promising survival rate, 99% survival after 1 71 and 3 years 72 in function. ZLS restorations have also exhibited clinically acceptable marginal gaps, all <100 μm for tooth and implant supported restorations 73–75 . More clinical studies are required to confirm the long‐term performance of ZLS restorations as well as to investigated clinical complications.…”
Section: All‐ceramic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZLS restorations have also exhibited clinically acceptable marginal gaps, all <100 μm for tooth and implant supported restorations. [73][74][75] More clinical studies are required to confirm the long-term performance of ZLS restorations as well as to investigated clinical complications.…”
Section: Glass-matrix Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, another light silicone of a contrasting color is injected into the prosthesis, after which the silicon layers are removed and cuts are made to obtain longitudinal sections through which the marginal or internal fit can be studied using a light or an electronic microscope [8]. Tooth type, cement space, veneering porcelain, and firing cycles are the most important factors affecting the accuracy of the marginal fit [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%